Laserfiche WebLink
,~cnuTrs <br />Cit:.y Cou~cil <br />reb. 8, 1.984 <br />1.9£~4 Glater Glanzer fe.1C thaC an extra '51.20 per year per uni.t would be generated. <br />f3adgeC (Cont.) <br />1984 Sewer Mr. Glanzer presented Co the Counci.l. t:he pr.oposed 19£34 secaer budget. <br />I~udget Glanzer felt th~t a contingency fund should be added Co tkie ,ewer <br />budget. Clanzer poi.nted out LhaC t:here are no additiona7 moni.es i.n <br />Agenda bonds i.n the case o.F an emeroency. <br />ICem No. l.0 <br />~:trs. ~arr,l:ini comment:ed. on the amount. of money charged the City for <br />].ake overPl.ow i.n compar~i.son to what i.s bei_ng ch.arge.d other communl.ties. <br />rahey aslced if Che sewe.r bud;et was b2sed on a E30% charp,e for mobilehomes <br />and apart:menC units. Glanze.r repli.ed th~t ~LC was r~ot. <br />Cub '-later Mr. 1.'ahey polnted out that the l.etter. f.eom }3ruce tlubbar.d on tl~ie Cub <br />Installation water instal.l~ati_on was f.or Counci.l. i.nf:ormation. <br />Lettee Prom <br />Mr. 1#uUbard <br />Af;en<la <br />ICem No. 14 <br />ProsecuCi.on Mrs. Scal.ze po,(nted out t:hat the.re are cer.tain areas of the City with <br />Pees high cr~i.me r~Ces th~C cosY, t_he City a 1ot of money in both nol~i.ce~ <br />protection 1nd prosecution Lees. Scal.ze wondere<t ~it Che City could <br />Agenda request the property owners i.n these area, to cl.ean up Cheir arc~~as <br />Item No. 1.7 or r~qu:ire addi.Cional securi.ty ~;u~rds. <br />Nardini. poi.nted ouC thaC the Cit:y's sheriff's conCract ~i.s based on <br />numbec ot poli_ce caLls. <br />P4r. Sweeney fe1.C that the C~iCy could have a meeti_ng w:i.th Che property <br />owners. <br />P~[r. Fahey did not feel. the C~ity could do anythi.nb and felt Chis was <br />just a burden that Che City hacl to bear.. Pahey Ee1Y, t:hat the City <br />could onl.y spealc pri.vately caith the property owners. <br />Pahey suggested thaG tl~ie m~tter be tabled, while ll~ie City Attorney <br />researches t.1~e maCter. <br />'.Cas Torfei_tecl Mr. Sweeney reported t:hztt there~ o~as mix-up i.n the tax-f.orf:e.iCed <br />Property On property on La4ce Gervai.s. Apparently, the lendin~; i.nsCi.CUt=ion ~1id <br />Gervai.s not notiSy the prope:t•ty o*.oner of. the pendi.ng Cax-forf.ei.ture so tlle <br />properCy owner will be al.l.osaed to act i.n thi.s matter. <br />Page -].1.- <br />