Laserfiche WebLink
rrrr~u~rrs <br />City Counci.l. <br />reb. fl, 19£34 <br />p~r~~ ^1r,. ?Vardi.ni. introduced the foll.owing resoluCi.on and moved i.t.s ~~dopt.i.on: <br />Comm:issi.on <br />AppoinCments RRSOLUTION N0. 84-2-5£~ - AT'POIN'P.ING 1_?LATNE ZOCH, <br />(Cont.) SIP4 MORFLAN AND AIIG~lOIA> ~ZPNT 'L'0 Tb(i; 7?ARi< <br />COMMISSION POR 'P];RMS Ok 11(REL; YItAP.S Jli'GiNN~.ING <br />IN 1984 TI~ROUGIt 19£~h <br />'Phe fo~re~;oing resolut:ion was dul.y secondec1 by Mr. }~orsberg. <br />Ayes (4) ilaed:i.n:i, }?orsbcrp„ Scalze, T'ahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />I2esoluci.on declar~d aciopted. <br />'I'hi.s resol.ution appears in Resol.ati_on Rook No. 10, Page 66. <br />Aehr yr. torsberp inCrodt.iced the foll.owi.n~ resol.uCi.on and mov~d ~.i.ts adoption: <br />Assessment <br />RESOLUTION N0. £54-2-59 - f3RINGIDiG 'CO 'CABLF <br />9„enda THE ~1AT7'liR OP THr ~3T1[R A>SES ;M13N'C <br />Item No, 6 <br />The foregoing resolution was dul.y seconded Uy Mrs. Nardin~i.. <br />Ayes (4) Porsberg, Nardini., ical.ze, Tahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />ftesoluti.on declared adopted. <br />'CViis resol.uti.on appears tin Resolution J3ook No. 1.0, Page 67. <br />'Che C~i_Cy At:torney passed out materi.al.s t:o thee Council regardi-ng an <br />Attorney General's opin.ion from 1965 reKarding the col.lect;ion of <br />assessrtienCS ancl vacated streets. 'rhe statement says that the Ci.ty <br />does not have the authori.ty to collect assessments as 1 condit:~,ion <br />of: vacati.nn a streeC.. <br />'Ck~e attorney stated Chat the City owns a sCreet i.n th~: i.ntesests of. <br />the publ.ic, [Jpon Lhe vacation of a streeC, the property reverts to <br />the oroperty £rom wh~ich tit came. Normal].y, the property i.s given to <br />the abutti.ng property. <br />The Attorney sCated that the Ci.t:y can assess the cost of 4:he irnprovement, <br />buC the property ocaner has the rigl~t to appe~i the assessmenC. 'L'he <br />C:ity has thc opti.on of. s~~readinf; the cost ot Che zmprovement for th~~~ <br />propose<I Latce Streee over the entire project. <br />The Fngi.neer sC~ted that there was one case ~i_n whi.ch the Ci.ty tient bacl< <br />and assessed a supplement.al. assessment. Mr. Fahey aslced i.f. the Ci.ty <br />could do t1~is now. Tlte Attorney sCet~d that. it could, but theti the <br />entise assessment ro1.l. would be open to app~al.. <br />Mr. t~orsberp, poi.nYed out thaC the CiCy could vlcaCe Lake Street abutt.ing <br />73ehr property and ~;i.ve the property to Mr. i3elir. <br />1?age -3- <br />