Laserfiche WebLink
MINt)TFS <br />City Council <br />March ?_l, 1984 <br />Signs (Cont.) 'l'he PLanner sCated that the lep,al name of the busi.ness coul.d be <br />put on this type of si~;n. <br />Ms. Stell.ick stated thattl~ey were inf.ormed that thi.s si.gn was not <br />permitteci. Mr.s. Nardini. stated that she would speak to the <br />I3u:i.ldi.ng Inspector about. this. <br />Mr. rahey aslced if an area i.dentif:icati.on sign could be located on <br />another piece of property. Pahey felt it would be better to have <br />a requisemenC that the sign must be within so many feet of the <br />property. <br />'Che Planner stated that an area identi.f.ication sig,n must Ue l.ocated <br />coithin the area it identifies. If. i.t is wit of the area~ it is <br />a directional sign. The Planner stated that a directionaJ. sign <br />bears the business name, address and di.rectional arrows and can <br />be located on pubLic or private properCy. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni. poi.nt:ed out that Stenger sign on i,ittle Canada Road <br />anci Centerville Road i.n relation to the Steng,er property. <br />Mrs. Scalze aslceci if thi.s type of. sign could be handled under a <br />conditi.onal use permit. The Planner stated that: that is what he <br />would su~;gest. The Planner stated that an area ictentifi.cation <br />si.nn would have to be at the entr.ance to Che property. However~ <br />a<ti.rectional. si.gn is a di.f.ferent matter. <br />'Che Pl.anner suggesced that he draft sometk~i.ng to disti.nguish <br />between the two tynes ot si.gns more clearly. <br />Scalze poi.nted out t:hat on Rice Street it would be a hazard not <br />Co have that particular si~n in place Co i.ndi.cate where these <br />businesses are. <br />Fahey agreed that area identificati.on should be on the property~ <br />and directi.onal si~;n shoul.d be in Che i.mmediate vici.nity. <br />The Planner sLated that the directional. si.~n would be of.f.-premises <br />with the name and address of the business and ].ocated ~aithin a <br />reasonable vicini.ty to the business unless there i.s justifi.cation <br />presented to the CounciL ~ <br />Pahey pointed out that Che i.ndustrial area near Stenger's wi.ll <br />develop some day and the whole area caill need to be identtified. <br />Pahey pointed out that whatever Mr. Stengcr i.s allocaed to do, other <br />business in the same area will wante <br />~]r. Quirin asked Che s:i.ze oI an identificati.on si.gn. The Planner <br />repli.ed that 10 snuare feet is allowed per si.gn. <br />Page -4- <br />