Laserfiche WebLink
~fINUTF.S <br />City Counci.l <br />March 21, 1984 <br />Si.gns (Cont.) Mrs. Clausen suggested that the Ci-ty erect a City directory at the <br />Ci.ty Center. <br />Mr. Li.cht commented that. the probLems are arising due to the sCreet <br />nami.n{; system and numberi.ng system. <br />Mr.s. Scalze f.elt that i.f. Chere ~oere directi-onal s~i.gns erected, <br />they shoul<t be smal.l anct uniform. The J?7.anner sugs>,ested that they <br />coul.d be erected on street si.~;ns. <br />Mr. I'ahey poi.nted out that the Council would have contr.ol if handled <br />under a conditional use permit. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni felt that Ckie Ci.ty should erect directional signs, <br />NIrs. Scal.ze di.sa~;r.eed. Scalz.e poi.nted ouC Chat the City could <br />require a certain type ot s:i.~;n to ensure. uniLormi.ty. <br />Mrs. ~ardi.ni. felt that the Ci.ty could erect the dir.ecti.onal si.gn <br />at: less cost than a busi.ness. <br />Mr. Qui.ri.n f.elt that tlie City wouLd attract undue cr:i_ticism i.f: i.c <br />erected directi.onal si.gns. <br />The Planner >tated that the City would develop criteria under which <br />a di.recti.onal. sign ~voiil.d be erecteda The Planner stated Chat the <br />problem woul.d have to be a demonstrated and doc~mented one. <br />~li-i<e Holmes aslced aUouT, a case where another busi.ness is compLaini.ng <br />abouC another Uusiness. ~'~Ir. I~lolmes stated Chat he Yets tr.uclcs at <br />his business tryi.ng to fi.nd Vi.ncent Drass and Reynolds. Mr. Flolmes <br />asked if. the Ci.ty ~oould accept this documentation. <br />Mrs. Nardini f.elt that there sho~il.d be si.gns identif.yi_ng the businesses <br />at the entrance to Ryan Industri.al Parlc. 7'he Pl.anner suggested that <br />address numberin~; could be nlaced on tlie Spruce Street si~n. <br />Mr. Pahey fel.t that the Planner should report to the f:ull Co~mcil. <br />on disectional signs aC a later date. <br />Mrs. Nardi-n:i. stated thak she caas agreeable to 7_5% o.f: windows being <br />signed. "4r. Pahey reported thaC Che S:ign Committee i.s recommendi.np, <br />33% excl.usive of, holi_day signs. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that she f.e1t that the ordi.nance should be simple <br />for the i~ui.ldi.nh Ins~ector to enforce, Sc~lze stated that visibili.ty <br />and safety must be consi.dered in the wipdow signing. <br />Ms. Stellick stated that the current Language in the ordinance <br />requi.res a permit Lor a holiday sign. <br />Ms. Ti.pler stated that ~a:ith 33%, of: a windoca si.~;ned, i.t would malce it <br />harder f.or. a sheri£f. to look into. <br />Page -6- <br />