My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-84 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
04-11-84 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:03:07 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINU'CE~;S <br />City Council <br />npri.l ).1, 19H4 <br />Si.nns P4r. klanson questi.oned cahetk~er the Counci.l shoul.d have the proposed <br />amenciments to the Si.n,n Ordinance before them before acC~ing, on th~i.s <br />Agencia matter. <br />Item No. 21. <br />Mr. Fahey sCaC~d Yhat the i.dea ~~ras to have a concensus of Che <br />Counc:il before spending money on the Planner's preparing the <br />amendments. <br />Kr, Hansoei aslced what woul.d happen i.n the case of ~ bi.i,i_ness th~it <br />di_d not have wi.nctows. N(rs. Narciini. explained that so:i.ndow s:ign, <br />sti.l.l. f:el.l. under t:he 15% si.J.ouette ].irnitation so the busi.ness <br />would use thei.r all.otment somewhere el.se. <br />Nfr. ~ocsb~rp, zslced wlacre t:he situ~tion wenC iP lie ainci P1r, Hanson <br />were not agrceable to the clian~;es pr.oposecl, irs. Sc11ae explained <br />[:hat then the oid ordi.nanc:e would be i.n ef:f.ect, whi.ch is more <br />restri.ctive than r•rhat is be~ing proposed. <br />Scatz,e explai.ned thaC the proposal beLore the Counci.l :i.s a compromise <br />t_hat was worlced out w~i.th the busi.ness community. <br />N1r. Forsberg strzted that he felC the Ci.t:.y was too restri.ctive on <br />si~ns. Forsberg poi.nted out Che higl~~taxes in the City and also <br />the fact that the City has adopted Appendix P. <br />P~~hey state<1 that the proposal was lEUS restr.ict.i.ve than the current <br />ordi.nemce. <br />Forsber; asked :i.f Cl~e busi.ness community was a~;reeaUl.e to the compromi.seo <br />i'ahey noi.nted ouC that the Ci.ty gavc Lhe busi.ness communi[y what: it <br />aske<1 for on four items, but that a compromi.,e caas worlced out on the <br />t:emporary si;n :issue. <br />~1r. Pahey ~introctuced the followi.np, re,olution and moved its ~dopti.on: <br />P..PSOI.UTION I~O. t34-4-175 - ADO7?TING RESOLUTIONS <br />n0. 84-3-]22, 84-3-123, £34-3-1.2/s AND F34-3-125 <br />E1S ST't' 1~OR7'1! I~l TtL.s ~1IP]U7'ICS OP TI~IG MARCH 21, 1.98~F <br />COUNCIL MI?R'CING AS F~PING CHANG)'sS IN 'Pt~IG SIGN <br />ORU:CNANCE THAT WL,RE idORKED OUT W~CTH 'LHL' COUNCII.,, <br />BIISINL9 i COMP4UNITY APID CITI7EN -AT _ LARGI3 DURING <br />TkIL MARCH 21 WO~RISS}IOP ON 'I9IPs SZGN ORDIi3ANCE <br />The foregoi.ng resoluti.on was ehil.y seconded hy ;1r. Itanson. <br />Ayes (5) Pahey~ Hanson, I'orsberg, Nnrdini., Scal.ze. <br />Vezyes (0). <br />I2e,olut.~,on declared aclo*~ted. <br />Tt~~is resolut:ion appezirs in Resol.ution I3oolc i?o. 1.1, Pa~e 189. <br />?'ap,e -1.6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.