05-23-84 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

!QINiI'PF,u CiCy Council Ma~ 7.3, 19fl4 tC:i.mmes Mrs. Scalze staeed that if t.here proposal park on i.t. >calze poi.nted ouk (Cont.) for Four tenants. ~is blaclcf..o~~ Chere, someone wi.ll. that there w:i_1.1. be~~ E3 ge~rag,e sY_a11, Mr. 'P'ahey ,tated that he d~S.d a~ot,: t:hinlc Chat the property was 7.ar~c enough. ~1r. Kiimnes sCated that the property is 30,000 combi.ned, 'Che P1lnner stat.ed t.hat the ordinance says that a g~~rage cannot be rcnted to other Chtui ~ tenant i.f, :iC is a rer.quired parki.ng space. TPie Planner stated thaC the parlcing :in Che f.ront cannot be considered as requi.red parki.ng. Nardini pointed out that once the eoad ie w~idened, there ~•~~i.ll be no ~arl<i.n~ fo~r. v~isitors i.n the f.ront. "Qr. llanson felt. rhat the parking Che ~;arap.,e i_> bi.iilC. Mr. 'rlanson adctrrssed Che nroblem of re.ntal poi.nte.d out that the nroperty i.s the property i.s cl~anged to PUD, the C:ity. in the f.ronC should be allowed unr.il felt thlt the ordi_nance alr.eacly oE the garage stalls. Hanson non-con£onn~ing, ~s '13-3 und once the conCrol.s w~.ill be i.n ptace For 'Lhe P1~inner poi.nted out that: he has a su~;~~sted parkina arran;ement th:~t: i.s <.aorkable on th~ easC. t4r. i"ahey asked if the nelghbors replied that they do noC object posit:ive for the pro~~erty. Mr. neede.d. Kimmes poi.nted out th~t four unit:s. i<immes stated Chat objecC Co the proposa7.. Mr. '<i.mmes as he i.s tryind to do ,orneth:i.n~ 1Ci.rnmes staCed thaC Ci~ie ~ara~;es are there are Four Eami.l.:i.es 7.ivin{; i.n todaY~ mosC famil.:ies have toro vehicles. `1r.s< 3cal.ze steted Chat i_t shou7.d be sti.pul.ated Chat these a~araoes cannot be r.erit~d other than to the tenants of the nroperty, Sca1.ze statr..d that she ~aoul.d also l.i.t<e to see t:he blaclctop removed frorn t:lie front of the property. P9r. .Cimmes ~Catea that removal of. the bladctop may ceause a draina~e orobl.em and poi.nted out thaC there ar.e no storm sewers i_n th~i.s area. Mrs. Nardi.n:i. suggested Chat the ~;reen srea be corisidexed at Che tirn~~~ that; the I.,i.Ct'ie ~anad:~ Road project is being comPl.eted. P1rs, Sca7.ze asked iS Che par)c~i.n~ coutd be removecl from th:i.s 1.ocaCi.on by anoCher me~ns. Mr. Ki.mmes staCed Ckiat he h~d no objection Co t_i~ii.s. ?4r. Fahey sCated t:h,at he wou7.ct be ~in favor. of the proposal. i.,f t.:l~e parlcing coul.d be removed in the fem~t of 339 L,i.tCl.e Canada iZoad. T'ahey stated thziC tl~e b7.aclct;op could be removed aC the t,i.me of. the road project and r.eplaced svi.th gr.een area, i.f. feasibl.e from a drainxige standpoi.nC. Y:a~;e -16-