07-25-84 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINU7'ES C~i.Ly Cotmci_1 Ju1y 7_5, 1.934 Schl.etty Woods (ConC.) 'Phe City Attor.ney agreed that the May, 1979 plat was never recorded, Sweeney i.ndi.cated Chat a couple oL qui.t clai.m deeds have been recorded i.n June of thi.s year using legal clescri.pCions from Che di.agram. The F~tCOrney i.ndicated that Kr. Schletty owns Tracts A, 13, C, and D but has gi.ven t.he City an easement over 'Pract C to thc City. This was rec.orcted on June 1£3, 1984. The Attorney stateci chat P1r. Schletty claims that the deeds were f.il.ed to seC up separate tax desi.gnaCions for the tracts. Sweeney stated that he believes that Tract A has been sold subjec[ to soi.1 bor~ings, but does not lcnoca the status of Tracts I3 and D. 9'he Attorney staCed that i.t i.s hi.s opini.on that the City can deny a bui.lcti.ng permi.t: for Tract A because it has not been approved by the City as the pLat was never f:i.led and the Ci.me li.mit Lor fil.ino tlie plat has expi.red. Mro Sckile[ty should be no[if.i.e<t if this is the City~swi.shes. Mrs. Scalze stated thaC if the p1aC has never been filed, she feels ttiat the matte.r i.s Uack to square one. The At:torney stated that under current code a plat must Ue fil.ed wichin 100 days of approval. The ~ttorney stated that the old ordinanc.e provided 60 days in wliich the plat must be filed. ^1r. Pahey stated that i_n other cases where the time ].i.mit. has lapse<1, the City has reapprovect t:he plat. Mr.. Current stated that the resi.dents of: Schletty Idoods ar.e not against iIr. Schletty's dividi.ng Outlot A, providi.np, it i.s done under the ord:i.nance so that the currenC property ocaners ar.e protected. Curr.ent pointed out T.hat no public hearings were held and no consi.der- ati.on was gi.ven oF t:he drai.nage of. the area. Curr.ent pointed out that the property is in a shoreland area and the plat has impact on tlte current property owners. Mrs, Timmons staCed Chat iL C9r. Schl.etty has to replaC the property, the pl.at would be handled properly with the L"VP. revi.ewing i.t anr.l shorel.and ordinances bein~; talcen into consi.cieration. Mrs. Scalze asked if the City can requi.re Mr, Schletty to repl.ar. the property. 'Che Attorney repiied that the Ci.ty can. Mr.s. Scalze commented that thin~s have chan~ed si.nce 1978 and this i.s why the City's ordi.nance has a time l.:i.mi.t [or f.i.li.ng plats, Scal.ze scated that she Fel.t: ,-tr. Schl.etty should Ue i.nf'ormed that he does no[ have 'f.racts A, B, C~ and D. Mr. Pahey stated that the City has approvect the plat and i.f: there is a good-Lai.th purchaser. involvecl, Chis wi.11 compl.icate matters. Page -12-