08-08-84 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

rntr~u•r.rs c:lC.y Council. Aug. £~, 7.98[o- ~~~~~L P:tr. Pahey i.ntroduced t.ie follo~;ri.np, resol.ution and moved i.ts adoption: Fldjustmenes (Cont.) RESOLIJ'1'ION N0. 84-4-365 - 'I'RANSI'fiP,RING $10,000 TROii 7'LtE 1~7,RF 7'RUC[~ T~tJND 'CO 'L'HP GPNPBAI~ PUDID TO PAY POR THt3 SPRINKLPR SYSTI;Lf AT TI~IP T'IRE STA'C]~.ON 7'he fore~;oing resol.ut:i.on was duly seconded Uy Mr, I'orsber~;. Ayes (5) }.'ahey, Tor.sberg, Idanson, Scn7.ze, Nard~ini., Nayes (0). Reso7uti.on declared adoptecl, 'Chis resoluti~~n appears i.n 12esolution T~ool.c No. 17., Pa~e 385, Mr. ~Pahey i-ntroduced Che foll.owi.nf; resolut:i.on and rnovecl :i.ts adopCi-on: RtiSOL,II'CION i~0. 84-8-366 - TRANS'GY;RRTNG ~6,000 PROP1 'CHF; GI?NLI;AL I'UND TO 'LH}g SE~tIOR CIT7'T,Gi~ PtID]D TO CLOSE OUT THF3 RT;MAINING DliFICI9' The Loregoinc; resol.uCi.on was dul.y seconded by Mr. Porsberg, Ayes (5) Paheq, i'orsberg, 1-lanson, .^>calz.e, Nardi.n~.i. ~tayes (0). Resol.at.i.on declared adopted. This resot.ut:~i.on lppears in Resolution I3ook ,~'o. 17., Yage 356. l~lealtti P1r. l~ahey stated ChaC it tivas h1s f.eel.ing ttiat the_ C:Lty had to :(nsurance provi.de hcal.th i.nsurance coverage for C:i.ty empl.oyees and t?iei.r dependents. n~E„a<~ Item No. 32 ~Irs. Scalze stated that Che Cit:y has t:o be fair ~ai.th rall. empl.oyees, and it appear.s Co her tl~~at Chose employces cover.ed by SF[ARE a~re gett.i.ng more Chan those o~ho are not:. l~ahey stated t.hat the C~i.t:y does noC have enough employees to geC in undcr a group p1en. Scal.ze aslced about the League of ~linnesoCa Ci_ties ~roup the Ci.ty could c;et i.n wi.th. N[r. Porsbern statecl t:hat. lie Goould 1i1ce ti.me to stucly the materitil Che Clerlc provi.cled. ~Ir. tlanson fel.t that the matCer should be brou~;ht up at. budg~c t:ime. Mrs. Scal.ze staCed that: she woul.d L~i_ke to ehecic on pr3.vate i.ndustry's healtli plans to see what pri.vate industry provi.des. hir. i'ahey sCated that by I~rovi.d~i.ng `illARt? Co the empl.oyees, the Ci.ty may be able Co provide better coveraoe at a lower cost. T~ahey stated thaC un1E>ss the CiCy h1s a ~roup p1an, the cost per employee will. be considered by ap,e, aricl Che Ci.Cy cannot hol.d the age of. an empl.oyec a~ainst them. Page -'19-.