Laserfiche WebLink
?:I'~ nIi)~)~r;ci <br />~.'lt:y ~:OllTlCtl <br />~~E~f. ~7y ~.9~~~~ <br />1~rison P1rs. Saa7.ze po~.nted out that ycars ano oeop7.e d7d not sue as [-hey <br />Suh~di.v~i.si.on dq today. Scal~e felt thr:it a loC of t:he probl.~m i_s t:itst people <br />(Cont.) h2ve Co proCect P:he~ne;elves, <br />C4r.. I~ahey sCated Chat t!.ie Ci.ty's ordin~nce do~~s not: sCat.-.e Ch,n~t th<:~ <br />hoineowners has to be char~,ed ~hese cost ,. F~"~ihey sCxted thaC some <br />other c~iL~i.es have tiCle., insurance i.n tl~cir names that ~a;i_17. cover <br />Che. Ci_ty should th~-~re be a defecC i_n th~~ ti_t:lc of: ~ propert.y. <br />l~~~hey fe'Lt C)taC perhaps if,' the C~ity i.s requiring t:haC a Ci.tle be <br />exam~ined, the C~i_t:y shoul.d pick un the cost. <br />~:'ahey >taGed t1~aC he, di.c,! not feal Chat t.t~e clrainage and ut:il.i.Cy <br />e.~semcents were~ necF.ssary on thc i~r,i.5on ~~~ropert:y. Tt acis only requtrecl, <br />beca~.i;e of Ch~; ord~inrance. <br />i-Jr. For~,b~r~s asl:ed if there wa, so~netl~i.ng peculi_~r about t:,hi_s t~itl.e <br />thrit thc cost o£ tL~e ~uami.naCi.on ~vas so muc}~. `i'he~ Ci.ty AtCOn~~ey <br />rep'1i_ed Y_hat tLc.re was not< 7'lie ACCOrncy sta[ed that i.C: there i.s <br />tttl.~ insurrinca~ 1vai.l.zible to the C~t~~, he would noC have to exami.nc <br />t.it:le;. nir. Swe~eney also reporCed that h~is ofEi.ce prepared thc <br />E~~s2men~ ~in thi , case, =.uhicti he nornial~l.y do~-~s not do, <br />T'he property orrner reported C1'iaC she cal.led four di_f_~ferent ~CCorneys <br />and ;oC c~uotr.,s of: $t25 tot e;:anini_ng a t~itle, <br />'Che Ci.cy At.COrney stated thai: hE is i.ri the bus~incss of provi.din~; <br />1.e~11. work Co the Ci.ty, and th~i.:; oart:i.cular worl< coas bi.lled on the <br />samc i~~isis ~is oihar work has be.en bi.l1.ed a_n the pasT,. <br />"~rs, Sc.aLze potnted out that one of the r~asons t:4ic Ci_C.y i.; requ~.iri_ng <br />t}lese e,~semeni_s i_s because the Ci.ty did not oct~. thein :in the cnse of <br />P~~ync Avenue unti.l. after Cne nronerty was clcveloped. <br />^4r. T'rison crnnmenGed that perhaps the Ieap,~.ie of i4i.r~nesota Citi.eg <br />can I~eln lobb~~ so tha~t khes4 Cypes of costs cannot. etzceed 2 1/2% <br />of ti~ie cost of; the dcaelli_nge <br />,.r. T',ihey felt Lhat Mr, Pr~i.son should be ;;:ivc~i some rel~i.c~[ because <br />CJ~e Oi.P:y's ordinance ~.aiJ.7. P~e amended Co noC rer~uire* easements :ii <br />~i_t i, recomrnended by the Pn,~i.~eee, <br />Mrs. Sc~l.ze asked if' tlie City ~aouLd be Sctcinf; a pre<.~de.nt l,~y ;ivirig <br />a reEund to ~!r, l+r.~~i_son. 'I'he City C1erl< Ec1C tu~at tliis ~aas the f~i_rst. <br />ca,e af thii, nature, <br />~?x~. 1~ahcy introduced t.;~c fol.to~~r~i.ng reso~~ut;i.or, ancl iuoved its adopti.on: <br />RP,SO,i,UTt0i~7 hQ, ~34._.9-[F07 -- RF3D~JCI.iIG T1{P CI-IAI~Gii, i <br />i~'\Di; 'CO i~[R. iPRT;i!b\ TP! IIIS SIJ,`1DIVIi:[0?t P.''QUT:S'C <br />~iY ~274~.00 ~A:iT'',D ON 'C~HE Ui!USUAL CTI~CUt-(S'I'/\\Ci?S <br />f'~~~ -~-- <br />