Laserfiche WebLink
MTNU'C~S <br />Ci.ty Counci.l. <br />Sept. 26, 1984 <br />R& S Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adopCion: <br />RESOLlJTION N0. 84-9-[43[~ - TAT3LING ACTION <br />ON THE R& S CODIDITIONAL IJSE PERMIT <br />RF.QIJES'.C UNTIL 'PFII: NL.XT COUNCIL t4T;F;'CING <br />The fore~;oing resolution was dul.y seconded by T4r.. Porsberg. <br />Ayes (4) 1°ahey, Forsberg, N1rdi.ni, Scal.ze. <br />Naiyes (0), <br />Resolution declar.ed adopCect. <br />Thi.s resolution appears in 12esol.ut5.on 13ook No. 11, Page 448. <br />Mr. F3ob 7,i.lge of L'mpire ~uclcet appeared beLore the Council requesCi.ng <br />wktat the Counc~i.l. i.ntends to do about the road i.ssue i_n thi.s area. <br />Mr. Pahey staL-ed that the matter of: road e~sements can be made a <br />part of the requirement Ior the approval of. the conditi.onal use <br />permit for R & S. <br />Mr. rorsberg poinCed out that be£ore Che City could do anyth:ing about <br />a second access int:o this area, hearinp,s caould have to be i~ield. <br />NSr. Deeb aslced how wide a road the Ci.ty ~oas consi.deri.ng. Mr. Pahey <br />felt that in an :industr.:ial area such as thi.s, the road should be <br />60 Eeet wide. <br />Mr.. Pahey i.nf.ormed the auclience thaL the matter ~aill be on Che ap,enda <br />£or the October 1.0 Cotmcil meeti.ng. <br />Mr.. 7.i.l~;e inf.ormed the Councii that i.f a road h1s to go i.n, the <br />}iusiness owners are in favor of. alternative ;~`5. ^1r. Fahey poi.nted <br />out that this is al.so the alternative that the Pl.anni.ng Commissi.on <br />cecommended. <br />Mr. 7itge sCated that: the businessowners do not want to give 60 f:eet <br />tor the road. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that i.f. a road goes i.n, it should be assessed <br />against all the businesses i.n the area and not just the ones that <br />would Iront on the road. Mr. Zil.ge st~ted tha[: he woulcl not front <br />on the road, Uut he o~ould be ~aill.i.ng Co piclc up his share of the <br />assessments. <br />Mr. Rustad stated that R& S would also be wi.lli.ng to pay a share <br />of. the assessments. <br />Mr. Deeb suggested that be[ore the October 10 meeti.ng the L'ngineer <br />loolc at the area and determi.ne where the road would lie :in relati.on <br />to the exisCing hui.ldi.nos. Also, sewer and water should be considered. <br />Pnge -10- <br />