Laserfiche WebLink
MINU'CFS <br />Ctity Counc:i.l. <br />Sept. 26, 1.9F34 <br />hy2n Parlc <br />(Conte) <br />Centerville <br />Road <br />Culverts <br />Agenda <br />Item No, 16 <br />The Pl.anner stated that the PUD would not apply to new development. <br />P1r. Porsberg stated t:hat the Planner was involved i.n a 1ot of: the <br />buildi.rtgs i.n the park, and asked why the City is hav:in,a, nroblems <br />wi.th tt~em. J7orsber.g also askeci how the City could designatc a PiID <br />in th~is ~~ark and not Larry Lee's. <br />The Planner stated that the two buildi.ngs he kias looked at there are <br />no records in Clte file on, just bui.tding permits. <br />Mr. Porsberg s~zggested ehat the Planner begin revi.ewi.ng some of. the <br />].ess seve re cases Li.rst, <br />Mr. P'orsUer~; al.so questi.oned orhose responsibi.lity it :i.s to ensure <br />that buildings geC compl.eted the eoay they should< Porsberg suFp,estect <br />that a f.i.nal occupancy permi.t should be, issued when everything i.s <br />compl.eted on a builcling. <br />9'he Planner repor.ted Chat he is sending, a letter to Carle Landscapi.ng <br />on the scre.enin~; and equi.pment storage on the property. <br />Nir. Fahey felt that the Planner should be di.r.~cted to worlc i.n Ryan's <br />Parl< on a case by casc Uasis beginning ori.th the bus company. <br />r]r, Porsberg suggested that the Planner Li.rst worlc on the businesses <br />that can come into compl.iance under the or.di.n~nce. 'Lhe Planner shoul.d <br />malce recommendati.ons on an individual basis. <br />It was pointed out that the bus ter.minal i.n the park is toCall.y :i.n <br />violati.on of the ordinance. <br />'Che engineer submi.tted a feasibil:ity report on Centerville Road and <br />1~ranch Ditch {(713-8-7_. The 13ngineer described the pipe ].ay-out and <br />reported that the estimat:ed cost is $1.7,£345. <br />The En~;ineer reported that he wi11 refer Che plan to the County arid <br />6datershed to see if t1~ey wi11 participate in t:he cost. <br />Mr. Fahey aslced if the Ci.ty could Uond Lor i.CS port~.ion of t:he improvement. <br />'Che Clerk replied that iC could, but would have to assess f.or 20% <br />of the improvement. <br />Uti.li.ty 7'he Ci.t:y Attorney presented to the Counc3.1. for approval a proposed <br />Reyui.rements ordinance relaCing to reyuired utility easemenCS. <br />Agenda Tclrs> Nar<tini. i.ntr.oduced the fol.l.owi.ng ordi.nance and moved its adoption: <br />Item No< 17 <br />~'age -25- <br />