Laserfiche WebLink
MINU7'IiS <br />Ci.ty Council. <br />Sept. 26, 1.9IIri <br />Drainage On <br />County Rd. ?3-2 <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 19a <br />Mr.s. Nardi.ni. reported that the property owner at 66f1 E.County Road <br />It-? has constructed a burm i.n hi., baclc yard and thi.s wi.ll channel <br />water f.rom si.x houses i.n the ar.ea onto another property. Nlr.s. Nardi.ni <br />felt that the L;n~i.neer should I.ook at the si.tuation. <br />Mr. tor.sberg felt that the 73ui.lding Inspector. and P:ngineer shou7.d <br />loolc at a problem of this type wi.thout havi.ng to be di.rected by the <br />Coimcil, Mr. Pahey a4reed. <br />Forsberg stai~ed that t:hi.s was a policing nroblem and the Council should <br />not need to pass resol.uti.ons on poli.ci.ng probl.ems. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni. introduced the. f:olLowi.ng resolution and moved i.ts adoptions <br />RESOLUTION N0. E34-9-464 - UIRPCTING Tlils CITY <br />ENGINt'sLR AND T~U2I.~DING INSPECTOR 'LO REVIE[d AT <br />THP:IR ]'sARL1:Is'ST POSSIBLI? CONVPNIPNCi.S THG <br />DRAINAGE PROf3LSM T3PING CItPATED ,!~T 66£3 I;. <br />COUNTY ROAD Ts-2 . <br />Pi_lli.ng In <br />westlunds <br />Development <br />Agenda <br />Acldi.ti.on <br />Grant <br />Appli.cation <br />AKenda <br />Addition <br />Tereau <br />].2ef und <br />Agenda <br />Adctition <br />cluly seconded by ^1rs. Scal.ze. <br />'This resolution appears i.n ResoLution I3oolc No. 11, Pa~;e 478, <br />The foregoing resoluti.on was <br />Ayes (2) Scalz.e, Nardini. <br />Nayes (7) I'orsberr, Pahey. <br />Resol.ut9,on deni.ed. <br />N1r. Pahc:y suggested that the Eng~ineer and Buildinf; Inspector go out <br />and talce car.e of the problem. <br />P1rs. Scalze repor[ed thaT. there have been about 40 loads of f.i.11 <br />brought i.n the idestl.und's devel.opment. Sca7.ze sugges[ed that the <br />Pngineer l.ool< at it. <br />^1r. Pahey suggested that the I3ui.ld:i.n~ Inspector handle the matter unl.ess <br />he feels the Eng:i.neer is necessary. <br />Mrs. ScaLze reporCed that the City's appli.cation f:or partc grant funds <br />f.ai.led by one poinC. The Ci.t:y wi-11 try to resubmit the application. <br />The Ci.ty Cl.erk requesked approval of the Ter.eau assessment refund in <br />the amount ot ~5.57.45 due to the <letermi.nation that the Tereau ].ot ~oas <br />not bv:ildable. <br />Page -?_8- <br />