Laserfiche WebLink
M7NU'CES <br />Ci.t:y Counci.~i. <br />Oct< 24, 1984 <br />Open Storage <br />(Cont,) <br />T4rs. Dlardini. i.ntroduced Che Pol.lowi.ng resoluCi.on and moved i.ts adoption: <br />RrSOLIJTION A70. f34-10-494~ - TAIILTNG AC'LIODI <br />OiV 7^tii ISSIlI; OF OI?E;DI S'f0I2AGE AS A 1?ER"4I'I"I'ED <br />tiSB OA COP1D'I'flONAL US13 U~lTIL 'CI~LE L'ULL COUNCIL <br />l i P?2T3S1''.'~!'C <br />Street <br />1?avin~; <br />PoJ. i.c~ <br />tlgenda <br />Item No. 1.2 <br />T}ie tore~oing resoluti.on was duly seconded by Ntr. l~o~rsberg. <br />:1yes (4-) Na~edi.ni., Porsberg, Ilanson, Scalze< <br />naqes (0). <br />Reso7.ut:i.on cleclared adooted< <br />'Chi., resol.uti.on appears ~in Beso7.trt:ion )3ook No, 11, 'P~;e 507. <br />'f.he 13nhi.neer submi.tCed t.o the Counci_1 a repox'C on the requi.rements <br />of 2djacenC cities ~ai.th eegardi.n~ to pav~ing of streets. Tl~e Rn,~ineeir <br />st:atsd that: th~ rnajority do a11ow buil.di.np., perm:i.ts Co be :issued without <br />the blacictoppin~; to be compl.eted. tlsuall.y ~ravel., curb and ~;utt~,~r are <br />reqni.red before bi.i~i.lding ~ermi_ts can be i.ssued, <br />Mrs. Nardini s~atecl t:hat i.f Lhe l:'sngi.neer f.eeLs Chat a street shoul.d <br />sit Lor a period of C~ime before i_C is pavecl, Chis i.s what she woul.d <br />l.i.tce i:o see done< <br />Cotmcil. discussed C6e i.ise~ of occupancy permits. 'Che lin~;i.neer sCat_ed <br />that: k~e ~e1C occupancq perinits shou].cI be issue.d when a house i.s ready <br />f.or occupancy. The Clerlc stated that iC is usually the bc~nl< or mortg~.ige <br />company th~xe requires an occupancy permit. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that the current ord~i.nance r.equi.res theit tl~ie roacl <br />be completed withi.n one year. P4rs< Nardi.ni fel.t that Cl~e w~dinance <br />should remain as i.s. <br />Mr. Car7.ey poi.nted ouC t:hat Franlc Frattalone's str.eeC i.s coveeed by <br />a bond so there i-s no problem on this st:reet, 7'he L'n,~ineer reported <br />that the LaMay b7.acke.op is down. <br />N[r.. Porsberg commented that the t_empor~ary cul.-de-sac i.s not. i_n i.n the <br />L~eMay AddiCion and a,lced why not. The Lng,ineer replied that he. clecided <br />to wai_t on thi.s cul-cle-sac until Che Counci.l deci.ded what i.t was goi.ng <br />to do on the Ceka cul-<le-sec. Mir. ~'orsber.•g f,elt ttiaC this shouJ.d have <br />been a Gouncil. dec~.i.si.on. <br />The L.ngi.neer stat:ecl Ckiat the cui'b coulcl be ].eft out on this cut-~de-saic <br />and just: the blacl<to}~ ci.rcle cou7.d be built, Or a pcrmanent: cul-de-sac <br />cou~l.d be put i.n. The IZn~;ineer askecl ~oho wou7.d p~y for removi.ng the. t:em- <br />porary cul.-de-sac when the street: is extended, <br />~~Ir. Porsberg staC.ed that: I~~e had no problem wit:h a temporary cul-de-~sac~ <br />ancl that: thi.s i.s cak~at w1s agreed to. Forsberg stated th<it the Ruil.ding <br />Inspcctor should be informed that no builcl;i.ng per.mits should be i.ssued <br />Yage -10- <br />