Laserfiche WebLink
M7~UTES <br />City Council <br />llec< ].2, 1.984 <br />Refuse <br />Col.lectors <br />(Cont.) <br />The foregoi.n,n, resolution was duly seconded Uy Mr. 1{anson. <br />Ayes (5) Pahey, l~ianson, Porsberg, Scalze, Nar.dini.. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resoluti.on appears in Resol.ur.i.on ~ook No. 11, Page 628. <br />Assessment The City Fngi.neer repor[ed that the assessment reapportionment on <br />Reapporti.onment Uivisi.on No. 058960 was routine. Also, the deletion of the <br />Div. ~o. 05~960 def.er.red assessment on thi.s Di.vision and the levy:i.n.p, of the <br />assessment against Parcel No. 53-14800-020-02 were routine. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 12 Mr.s. Scal.ze introduced the fol.lowing resol.ution and movect its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 84-12-460 - APPROVING TI~IF. <br />ASSESSMPNT RGAPPORTION~[ENT POR AUD. 5363, <br />D/P 5363, AiID. 1866, D/P 1866, DIVISION <br />NO< 058960 <br />'Che foregoin~ resol.uti.on was duly seconded by Mr. Porsberg. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Porsberg, l~tanson, Fahey~ Nardini. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Thi.s resol.ution appears in ResoLuCion 13ook No. 1.1., Pa~e 629. <br />Mrs. Nar<li.ni introduced the following resoluti.on and moved its adoption: <br />RPSOLiJTION N0. f34-1.Z.-461 - TF.RMIDIATING TIIE <br />DEPERR~D ASS~SSM~NT ON PARCliL N0. 53-03600-450-13 <br />POR IMP. N0. 7£5-18 AUD. 1F3h6, D/P 1566 AND Lr9YING <br />THE ASSF;SSMGNT AGAINST PARCBL N0. 53-14800-0?_0-02 <br />IN TFIE AMOU~'I' OF $3,656,64 TOR 11 YEARS AT ].0% <br />ITITER~ST <br />The f.oregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. <br />Ayes (5) Nardini., Porsberg, Pahey, Scalze, Hanson. <br />Nayes (0), <br />Resolution declared adopted, <br />Th~is resoluti.on appears in Resolution 13oolc No. L1, Page 630. <br />Watershed Mr. Fahey pointed out that the City must make a recommendation on the <br />District appoi.ntment of the. Watershed District ~lan~ger. <br />Manager <br /> Mrs. Nard~ini reported that she spolce with Chri.s Dr.ake of the Watershed <br />Agenda and he indi.cated that Mr. WahLgren, the current Manager, is a great <br />Item No. ]3 asset to the City and the City would s~ff.er a loss i.f he were not <br /> reappoi.nted. <br />Page -7- <br />