Laserfiche WebLink
MIVU'CFS <br />C~i.t:y Counci.l. <br />Peb. 27, 1.9£35 <br />Garas;es perm:it_ and anythinp; else wi.1.1 requi.re a permi.t. T'ahey commented <br />(Conte) thaC there should be a footage requiremenC f.or accessory buildings <br />that i.ncreases as the amoiult: of: arrea~;e i.nc:reases. <br />Mrs. Sca1.ze disa~reed. <br />7'he Plariner pointed out: that the curr.ent ordinance has a 1,000 fooC <br />accessor~ bui.lding li.mi.t.ati.on per lote <br />~ir. Pahey sCated that he ~aould go alonp, ~vi_th that. <br />Mrs. Scalze ~~ointed out that storage sheds shoul.d noe be covered <br />Uy thi.s or.dinance as build:ing permits are not requi_red for storage <br />sheds. <br />~r. Pahey i.nstructed the Attorney that any second ge.irage or. accessory <br />buildi.ng o~oul.d requi.r.e a c.ondi.Cional. use permit: and in no case can <br />the amount. of accessor.y bui.lcli.np space and g~irage space exceeci 1,000 <br />square Eeek. <br />The Attor.ney stated that khis was a dr~stic change of t:he ordinance. <br />l~ahey also ,tated that storaFe sheds orould not f:all. under thi.s <br />or<l:i.nance. <br />Imp. 85-3 & The En~,i.neer subm:i.t:ted to the Council feasit,~i.l.i.ty reports on <br />Imp. £35-4 Cmprovement No. 85-3, Ckte :improvement of: All.en Avenue from Payne <br /> to Thunder f3ay AdcliCi.on by sewer, wat er, roacl, curb and gu tter and <br />Agenda Impr.ovement No. 85-4, the improvement of All.en Avenue [rom Thunder <br />Items No. 14 & Aay Ac(di.tion f:o Greenbri.er by sewer, watr.r, road, curb and guttr-.r. <br />].5 <br /> A member of the audi.ence s taCed that she toas not in favor of the <br /> proposect ].ocation of: ~l.len Avenue as i.t woul.d be ciisec.r:,l.y atcross <br /> f.rom h~r driveway. <br />?9rs. Scalz.e commented that thi.s is how Al.len i_s propos~d on the Ci_ty's <br />thorou~hf.are plan and she did not thinic there was anoCher *.oay to put <br />A1.1en :in. <br />~1r. Fahey 1.nformed the audience that Ct~e ~ur.pose of a feasi_bi.l.ity <br />report i.s Co see i.f. a road can ~.~,o in. J~ahey poi.nCed out that the <br />as,essments f:or t:he road would, be about '~13,000 pc:i- lot. Fahey <br />commented that at that: cost the people may noT. want the road. <br />rlr. Fahey i.ntroduced the followi_ng reso].uCi.on and movect i.t.s adopti.on: <br />RPSOLII'CION N0. 85-7_-92 - ACCI?PTING THF <br />I~TASI})ILI'PY R1:POR'CS POR ti~dP. NOS. £35-3 <br />AND SS-4 AS PRPS1iNTPD f3Y T}IE CI'fY PNGINEEI2 <br />1?age -7.7- <br />