Laserfiche WebLink
+21NU~rrs <br />C:i.ty Co~mcit <br />Feb. 7_7, 19~i5 <br />City Dumpster Mrs< Nardi.ni sup.,gested that: the Ci.ty notify peo~le i.n C:he secaer <br />(Cont.) bi.l.ls of these alternat~i.ves. <br />A9r. I3lesener suggested that the Publ.i.c Worlcs SuperintendenC could <br />puC thi.s together. <br />Alr. Al.eseiler. then supgesCed that the dump,Cer be i.n operation <br />t.wo Saturdays e~ch month durin~ the summer and one Saturday a <br />montlt during the winter. Blesener felt that there was mor.e bei.ng <br />dumpecl. duri.ng the summer than wi_nter. F>lesener suggest:ed that <br />thi.s could be tried for tnree to six months on a trial. brisi.s. <br />The Ci.ty Gl.erk commented that most o£ the revenue loss occurs wlien <br />a second dumpsCer is ordered and is not £i.l.led. The Ci.t.y sti.ll <br />has to pay t:he fu11 pr.ice f:or this dumpster. <br />A1r. Blesener stated that the dumpster was in operation on 46 Saturdays, <br />anct 11 oL t2~iese Sa~tur.days a second dumpster had to be or.der.ed. 'Phi.s <br />second dumpster i.s respons~i.ble for a 1.oss to the City of 'k2,000. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the followi.n~ re,oJ.uLion and moved ~its adopti.on: <br />KI?SOLUTION D10. ~35-2-96 - LI~IITING TtIP GTTY <br />DUMPSTEI2 7'0 THE PIRST SATURDA`Z OF EVTiItY MONT41 <br />ALL YEAP,-ROUND AND 'CIiP 'CI-IIRD SATUBDAX 0]' liVFi2Y <br />M0~'Plt DURTNG TH3i P40N'L'HS OP APRII, 7'I~IROIJGH OC'l'0}3P:R <br />AND ALSO ADOP7'ING TtIE NEW DiJMPiTT:R RATrS AS <br />PROPOSED IlY THP )?UBLIC WORKS SUPPRIN'fENDE~]'C <br />'fhe Eoregoi.n~; resol.ut.i.on ~vas duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) .P,l.esener., Sca1.2e, Nardi.ni, Co1.lova~ i'ah~~y. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />'Chi.s resoiution tippears in rZesol.uti.on ?3oolc No. L?_, Pap,e 93. <br />Park Char,ges ^1r.s. Scalz.e c~uestion the way the Ci.ty has been determi_ning when ~ <br />park char~;e appl.ies and when it does not. Scalze asked ~ohen a <br />Agenda divisi.on i.s con;idered a subdi.vtsi.on. <br />It:em No. 1.9 <br />Mr. Faheq po5.nted out that on resi.clential ~roperty, the City gets <br />the paric che~iige when a buildi.ng permit is appl.ied for. <br />Mr. Blesener pointed out Chat t.he Yl.anner has stated th~t every <br />propc:rty divis:i.on i.s a subdi.visi.on. <br />'Che Planner stated that the i.ssues comes i.n :i.n terms of. i.nterpretaCi.on <br />of the Orda.nance where i.t says that the Council may exeinpt an <br />aC~pl.icant f:rom procecfural r.equirements. 'Che Planner stated thaC <br />the only procedural. requirements ar.e publi.c hearings. 'L'hc, Pl.anner <br />stated thaC hi.s i.nter.pretation i.s that every thin~; else i.s r.equi.red, <br />zind every subd'tvi_si.on ~~rou].d be st~bject to a parlc charge. <br />Pzige -70- <br />