02-27-85 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINU'f LS City Council ].~eb, 27, 1985 Prattalone Mr. Pahey stated that ouCSicle sY.or.a~;e i.s a permitt:ecl use under the Property Ordinance, but the storap,e would have to be f:enced, screened ancl Di.vi.si.on landscaped accorclin~; to the I'].anner's speci.f.ications. (Cont.) :~r. Pahey sug};ested tha[ the Ci.ty request that there be no development of. this 7_ 1/2 acr.e parcel beyond the secCi.on li.ne. Mr. Prattalone felt that t:his might be acceptable to the purchaser. Mr. Licht stat:ed that :i.i tkie property was subdi.vided, there wovld be more than one princi.ple bui.lcling on the propertq< Theref:ore, i.t ~oould be non-conformi.ng and nothi.ng coul.d be done ouCSi.cle the bui.ldings w~ithout a Conditional lJse PUD. Pahey su;nested that this be made part of: the approval. Mrs. Scalze aslced i.f. this div~.i.si_on woul.d be subject to parlc cliar~es. The Ci.ty Clerk di.d not f:ee1 it woulcl as ~i.t i_s not a subdi.vi.sion. The Pl.anner. stated that the request i_s bei.ng processed as a minor div:ision. City poLi.cy has been that for a minor subdivi.sion a rep,istered Land survey is used rather than requi.ri.ng a pl.at. 7'he Planner f.elt that it should be subject to the requirements oE platting, but thi_s lias not been City pol.~i.cy. DSr. Pahey aslced i.f thi.s di.vision shoulct be subject to par!c char~;ese The C~i.ty Attorney sCated that: he would say thi.s was a m~i.nor subdiv'i.sion. Pahey commenCed that the property i.s adjacent Co current industri.al use anct that the baclc porti.on of: Che proper.ty abi.itts the aplrtment g,ara,n,es. Pahey also pointed out that the C:iCy now has a sales contract befor.e them. 24r. Fahey also commentFd thae l~e fe1.t thaC inclustrial land should be processed as a subdivi.si.on. Fahey askeel i.f, the City could requ~ise a parl< charge as parC of the subdivision approval. 'The Attorney replied that he saw no problem with thi.s. Mrs. Narcli.ni, felt that 7. 1/?_ acres of industri.al propert:y shoul.cl be platted. The Planner stated that: the Frattalone proposal is a subdi.vi.si.on, but then read Che li.st of exceptions in the Ordi.nance. The Planner stated that it i.s the Council's di.scret:ion as to what it wants to relieve t:he apnlicant o(. Mrs. Sc~lze stated thaC i.f the Planner. determines that somethi.ng i.s a sub<li.v:i.si.on, i;he.n i.t should ~o to the Parlc Commi.ssion. Mr.s. Nar.dini £elt that t:he purchaser ,hould Ue i.nformed that the City may consi.der the rezoni.ng of the bacl< portion of. the property. Pa~;e -~4-