02-27-85 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~nrwrrs City Councii Feb. 27, 1985 Larry Lee Mr. Don Lais, represenCi.ng the T~'asciana family, appeared before the Peoposal. Cot.mci.l. ilr. Lais stated that he has not had Ci.me Co analqze the (Cont.) Lee proposal to see how ~it eff.ects the Fsasciana property. it[r.Lais al.so stated that ,"4r. i~asci ana £eel.s thac the whol.e parcel. should be zoned c.omme.rci.al. along with Che prope:rty to the south. Mr. Lai.s requested that the Council talce no acti.on on the Lee pr.oposal unCil he has l~~ad time to 1001.< aC :i.t. I.~i.s also commented f:hat the 1,000 Foot cul-de-sac is contrary Co Code and there i.s no guarantee that the street would ever be looped as sho~on. hir. Lziis a~lso stated that if the Lee proposal i.s approved, one of. the condi.tions i.s that the deve].oper put in the road with the cul-de-sac before ho i.s all.owed to get bu~i.ldi.ng permi.ts for the industri.al porti.on of. Che property. P9r. F~ahey comment:ed that Mr. I,a~i.s's request to study [he proposal is a reasonabl.e one~ because i.f: the Lee proposal is appr.ovecl as sk~o~on, Mr. Pascizina woul.d be 1ef.t. wi.tki no al.ternative oCher t:han R-1. devel.opment f:or hi.s propercy. Mr. Lai.s staCed thaC his mini_mum request. i.s that he Ue granted acidi.ti.onal. ti.me to stur.ly the eLf:ecCS of the proposal on the F'asci.ana proper.t.y. Mr. Lee stated t:hat where the outloC fits in makes no diff:¢rence to him. h(rs. Nard~i.ni stated that the Council could approve the concepC of the Lee proposal so that Mr. I.,ee I<nows Che Eeel.inas of Che Counci.l. Mr. Lee state<t that he would l.i.lce conce~t approval so that he Icnows i.f he should proceed Lur.Cher wiCh the plan. Mr. Lai.s ste.ited t:iiat another considerat~i.on i.s thaC Mr. Fasci.ana may r.e<~uest thaY. the lots on the south si.de of Che street be large.r to ensure a hinher quality development. Mr. Ecl Nadeau espressed concern about Che adclitional traff~ic that this development woul.d ;enerate on Nadeau itoad. Nadeai.~ was 11so concerned that Conduit would become a commercial sCreet. P1rs. Scal.ze pointed out that Conduit i_s not a resi.denti.al. strcet and that Mr. Nadeau's prooerty on Conduit i.s not resi.dent.ial.ly zoned. Mr. Fahey poi.nted out that i.f. the 7,och property went commercial, the City could reqtaire thaC. it access f.rom South Owasso Bl.vd. Mr. Pathey asked iS P4r. Aiade..vu objeceed to t:hi.,. r4r. Nadeau poi.nted out that he i.s surrounded by 900 LeeC of roads and felt that addit:i.onal roads should be bu:i_1t Co reli.eve Nadeau Roact of: some oE tk~e CrafF:ic. Mr. Nadeau stated that: i.f Nadeau Roafl has to be wi.dened, he wi.l.l have to pay Lor. :i.C. Page -~3-