Laserfiche WebLink
r~zNU'rr;s <br />C9.ey Counc~il <br />~1~ri1 10, 7.9H5 <br />7?ari< Land & <br />ISall.Lields <br />(Conte) <br />runni.nr; south ancl east and down to Lalce Ger.vai.s. Stenger steited <br />thaT. this should have been done severe~l years a~;o. <br />P1r.s. Scalze informed `~Ir.. Stenger. th~at C}te Ci.ty ~oi7.1. be tioldinf.>, a <br />11ear:i.ng for clrai.nage f:or the enti.re City on May 1 and tl~~i.s area <br />o~i.l.l. be addressed. <br />t~rs. Narcti.ni. poi.nted ouC that part of the reason tlle moratori.um <br />was cal.led was because of: the drai.nage. i_ssue, and noChing wi.l.1. <br />be cione in the area unCi.l tki~i.s is addressed. <br />P?r. t3lesener stated ChaY. the c.ul.ver.t 4/1.LI. bE3 r.epl.aced. Mr. Carl.ey <br />stated that nothin~ could be done unti.l the Ci.Cy comes up wi.th a <br />oray to pay for the project and th~i.s w~i.1.1. be addressed on May 1. <br />Mr.. Stenger f.elt that the County shoul.d have to pay Eor some of <br />the cost along w.i.th the State. The P..ngineer commented that the <br />Ci.ty can assess the County ~i.ts share, buC the State does not. <br />run ~i.ts water i.n tl~~i.s area. <br />14r. Fahey stated that the Ci.ty cannot do anyth:i.np, about the drai.nage <br />until it_ hoJ.ds a public hearing on the mntter. 77ahey suggested that <br />the Counci.l authori.se thc Png~i.neer to come up ~v~i_Ch a dra:i.nabe plan <br />for the area. <br />Mr. )il.esener introduced the follocaing resoluti.on an<I moved i.ts adopCi.on: <br />1?i360L1IT7:ON \0. 85-4-155 - INS'CRUCTI~G 7'Hi: <br />CTTY ENGINEFR TO 1?R1.PARI; A DRAINAGi; PLAN <br />1'OR THE C]iN'S'ERVTLI.1's 1?OAll PIZOP1312'CY t7Np}3R ~[ORATORIUM <br />IN 'CI~IL FOR Tllls COUNC7L'S h1AY 1 SJORKSAOY PSEPTING <br />The f.ore~oing resoluC~i_on ~aas dul.y seconded by Nlrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) S3l.esener, Scal.ze, Dlardi.ni, Go17.ova, i~ahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resoluti.on declared adopted. <br />This resol.ution anp~ars i.n Reso].uCi_on }3oolc No. 12, page L54. <br />i4rs. Scal.ze fel.t [tiat Che Parlc Commi.ssion should make z~ r.ecommendati.on <br />on the locati.on of pe.ir.lc land in Chis <irea. <br />TRrs, 'l,och statecl that tlie Pars Commi.ssion sLUdied the issue of ball.- <br />f:i.elds some Cime ap,o and deci.ded thaC there o~as a necd i.n Che Ci.ty. <br />A1r.. Johnson expressed concern thaC the size of. t:he parlc and i.t& location <br />i.n the i.ndust:rial. ar.ea wi.11. cuC down on the si.ze of the i.ndustri.al <br />land that wi.11 be left to devel.op. ~Ir. Johnson fel.t that the Council <br />shotil.d lceep in mind the extent that t:he pzrlc l.and wi.ll reduce t1~e <br />L:i.ght industr.i.al property i.n siz.e. <br />I'1ge -12- <br />