Laserfiche WebLink
ratrr~ rrr s <br />c; cy c~~~~,~ ~ ~. <br />Apri.l. 7.0, 7.98 i <br />Subdi_v~isi.ons i~'ahey commented ttaat he clid not £eel that si.x f.ooC casemenCS are <br />(Cont.) necessary around 1ot lines unJ.e,s they are recommended by the City Fn,~ineer. <br />Fahey pointecl oi.it ChaC in most cases, this is not even where the ` <br />dra~inage of: a property runs. T'ahey also commented tt~at ~ranCin~ these <br />ea,ement, to the Ci.Cy costs peopLe money. <br />Fahey poi.nted ouC that other ci.ti.es requ~ise ptatti.nn for three or <br />more lots. Pahey f.e].C thaC the C~i.Cy was charq~ing people too much <br />money. <br />'Che Attorney commenCed Chat it i.s with:in Clie Counci.l's ~rerogative t:o <br />chln~e the procedure. T1~e ACtorncy ooi.nted ouC, hocvever, C]aat the <br />devel.oncr's attorney ~is worl<ing Lor the clevr.loper. <br />The 9ttorney sCatecl that the City has ,r~otten ~i.nto orobl.erns in the past. <br />becau>e i.t clid not have easements. <br />Mrs. Na~rdi.ni aslced if Chese cosCS were not a part of doin~ business. <br />Naz•dini stat~d that people are selli.ng ~heir peoperty i~or tl~e purpose <br />of malci.n,~ money. Nardini coinment:ecl that the CiCy's job is to proCecC <br />the Ci.ty of I~.ittl.e Canada and the Counc~il has been told by its <br />~rotessi.on~ls Chat i.t needs dra:inabe easements. <br />Mr. Collova stated that it was also the job of: tt~e Council to <br />Iceep the cost down Lo people wkio ere spliCti.n~ their lots. <br />Mrs. 9c~lze stated tnat the Ci.ty cannoC treat busi.ness peo~>le differentl.y <br />than homeoraners. <br />`~tr. I'ahey stated tliat lii., sCrong,est objecti.on to Che ~lat:tin~ process <br />oras requiri.ng easernents t_hat were not necessary and then requir.i.ng an <br />examination oL titl.e on the property. <br />I.'ahey staCed that the c.i.Cy should requ:i.re easement:s, i.f that is the <br />recommendation of the City Pngi.neer and i.n that case, Che AtCOrney <br />shou7.d esamin~~z t:i.tle. P~hey recommend~d Chat the Council adopt this <br />pol.icy %ind that the City Att:orney amend the ord:i.nance accordi_ngly, <br />Fahey also Lelt that a plat raas not needed for a three-lot spl.iC. <br />Mrs. Scalze poi.nCed ouC the case oihere someone butlt thei.r lot up <br />four fect hi.gher than T,he adjoi.ni.n~ Lot. The linpinee,r replied tha~ <br />Lhe Ci_ty cli.cl have a pl.at i.n Chis case. The 13n~;ineer al.so f:el.t thlt <br />something lil<e th1.s was between the neip,hbor.s. <br />The Lln~i.neer stated that a 1ot of easements are just: a].i.eze on ~~aper <br />and coi11 never. be used. 7'he F:ngineer st~ted that Chere are some <br />cases that property w~i.Ch a legal. descri.ption that i.s compl.i.cated <br />must be platted. Zn cases i.ike th~i.s, the P.egister of Deeds reRuires <br />the p1aL-ting. <br />Pa~e -U- <br />