Laserfiche WebLink
r21.~uTrs <br />CiCy Counc,il <br />Anri.1. 10, ]9£35 <br />lCingsbury `I'he Pngineer stated that Pie ].oolced at tha area lasC fal.l„ but would <br />(Cont.) lil<e to loolc at i.t a~;a~in. <br />Mr. Kin~;sbury presented a pl.an Co the Council. Lor a change he woul.d <br />7.i1<e to~make ~i_n the dr~inzioe of l~i.s property. Kingsbury sCated that <br />t~e would lilce to Eill Che back of hi_s property so that wetter w,i11 <br />run down the west si.de ot: the »roperty and i.nlo a manhole on the. <br />property. ICi.ngsbury stat:ed Chat the f.~i.lli.n~; would get the drai.nz~;e <br />to where i.t should Ue t;oi.ng. <br />A4r. Ki.ngsbury reported thaC the peopl.e i.n the area claim that the <br />dr.ainage ~oas altered by an i.mprovemenl: that was done ~i.n the late <br />197o's. <br />P4r. Kingsbtrey staCed [hat: he ~aoulci also L:ilc~ Co request Chat Che, fi.ll. <br />permi.t: f.ee be waived as he i.s correcting a draina~;e problem and f;c~.tti_ng <br />Che dcainage on the City a~semenC. <br />C4r. 3lesener anreed that right now thc manholes ~i.n the area are useless. <br />The rn~~inecr sCated that he would 7.:i.lce to review the drainage p~l.an <br />and area bcEore tie comments on it. <br />Mr. `:Cingsbury reported Chat he considers his £i.1li.ng project just <br />a temporary soluti.on to the problem an~l reported th~t there is too <br />much water i_n the syste.m. <br />Mrs. Scalze aslced how many cubi.c yards were i.nvolved in the project. <br />Mr. Kingsbury esti_mated about 200 to 300 cubic yards. Kingsbury <br />also reported that the fee f:or the permi.t ~aould be about 3500. <br />.~`~ir. Fahey sCated that he could noi: see how the Ci.ty cot~ld waive t_he <br />permi_t [ee. <br />~lr. Ki.nnsbury st:ated ChaC he felt Che Ci.ty should bear somr:. of Che <br />r~esponsibi.l~i.ty for charigi.ng i:he raater (lo~o in the tirea. <br />Mrs. Scalze repli.ed that the County i.nstal.led th~e curbs in the area. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that the Counci.l. would have to look at the precedent <br />it woul.cl be sett-ing by wai.v~ing a fil.l perm~it fee. <br />S4r. Fahey staCed thaC he did not thi.nlc the ordi.nance al.lowed tl~e <br />Coi.incil to waive a permi.t fee. ~lr, Fahey commented that he thought <br />that whatever por.ti.on of Lhe f.ee that was not used up in engi_neeri.ng <br />costs or sCaff ti.me was refimdable. <br />i'ahey also ~oi.ntert out that tF~e F,ngi.neer reported Chat Che cuLverts <br />i.n tt~e areei would hancll.e the drai.nap,e, other than that of: a 1.00- <br />year rai_n. <br />The P;ngi.neer sta[ed that the culverts may need to be cleaned ouC and <br />possi.biy the curb built hi.~her. <br />Pane -R- <br />