Laserfiche WebLink
MINiJTES <br />Ci_ty Council. <br />April 24, 1935 <br />A~IcCol'Loch ~,fr. Fahey aslced N!r. Stenger kii.s p1~~xns for screening the pr.o~erty. Mr. <br />K~ }larstacl Sten~er r.epl.ied that the bti~i.l.diri~ would be set bactc 50 feet ancl would <br />1?roposal. be ~lmost bel~iind the SCl.cin house. SCenber stated t:hat t1~is .< <br />;houlcl be <br />(Corit.) . <br />enou~h screen-ing. <br /> Sca.l.ze pointed uur. that: on Che plans it sl~iows Puilding C i.s ~ 75 f.ooP: <br /> buil.di.nF on a 7.i foot lot. Scalze po.i.nt.ed out khat t:he overhmnp <br />o% t.lie <br /> , <br />bui.tdi.i~; wottlcl be encroach~i.ng on abuCtinp; property. <br /> .~?al~cy sug~;ested thaC ~r. Sten~er put in a fence for ScrFeni <br />~iF; Ckiat <br /> . <br />wou~Ld i~e acceptable to the ne~ighbors. <br /> Mr. SCenger stated that he Lelt that dle nrobl.em of~ tJ~e ove.rharig wou7.d <br /> be one that couLd be wor!<ed out witl~ t:}ie ilirt.l.di.ng fnspector. <br /> <br /> ~(r. Faliey sCatec( thrat hE~~ had no probl.em with the concepC oL Che p1a~n <br /> and potntecl out. tl~iat it. is a oennitted use in the clisCr.i.ct. <br />Pahey sugF;ested tk~at Che Counc;il. give iK;c. Stenger~ conce~~t: approval <br />ancl iinal approval could be subject Co s,itisfacCOr.y dra:iria~;e plan> <br />Lor the area and addressi.ng the netinhbor's concerns ~bout .Lot width~ <br />screeni.ng and bui.ldi.ng locati.on. Mr, I'ahey suggested [:hat Stenger <br />give ?4rs< iCl.c~i.n a copy o[ his survey, <br />David fQein ~islced to what: level [:he property ~oould be fi.l.led. i~frr. <br />SCeno~r re~l:ied that i.C cvoulcl be Li7.l.ed to the J.ev~l of Ri.ce StreeC< <br />NIL. K1ei.n was concerned thaiP: it tl~~i.s was done, there ti~~ould be an 8 foot <br />drop to Che F,1cI.n proper.ty and Kl.ein ~sked l~o~o the so.Ll. woul.cl I~~ he7.d <br />ul~. <br />Mz. Pahey su~~esCed that 1 dreiinat;e p1an, Copo and final topo be <br />submi.Cted by ~~(r. SCenger's enpineer, <br />~;r. SCen;er comment.~d Cl~at Chey di.d riot Plan Co do much caith li.~htino <br />the ar,-ea, ti,fr.. Fal~iey suggesCed thaC if any 'lightin~ is planned, @trs. <br />1U.e-in shoulcl be inf,ormed abouC ~.it. <br />Ntrs. Scal.ze stated that it i.s i.mf.orCUnnte t:hat these psoperties ar.e so <br />ncirrow as the C~.ity wi.ll end up w~.i.th sma7.1 bui.],cliii~s. <br />i~Irs. Scal.ze ~introduced the fol7.owins; resoJ.ution aud moved its adopt:i_on: <br />RI?SOLUT'SON D10. $5-4-7£3£3 - CLOSIA7G 'i.'HE ]'l7P,LIC <br />kIEARING ON 'I'I9,G McCOLLOCF[ ANI) HA$STAD REQUES'L <br />POR CONDI770'NAL IJSB PFR~fIT POR PUD <br />TPie foregoing re,sol.ut~.i.on wzis duly ,econded by i1r. B,lesener. <br />Ayes (5) ucalze, F31~sener, Nardini., P'ahey, Co1.lova. <br />Nayes (0). <br />~3esol.ution declaired adopted. <br />This resoli.irion appears ~ii1 P.esoLuCi.on .F1ook No. 12, 'Pa~;e 7.87. <br />Page -7- <br />