04-24-85 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i`~(II~~U'I'ES City Counci.l. April. 24~ 1985 :[>orclsen i~ir. i;ordsen subn~i-tted a copy of a buildic~g per.mi.t ChaC was issued Property ~ co lii.m f~ivc years a~;o f.o r tl~ie consCruction of a duple;c. The Cit:y Clerk poi_nted out tnat a t t.hat ti.me the C;i.t.;y all.owed C:he constr~.ic.t:ion (Cont<) of 1 duplex i.n every 10 single fami.ly homes. 1-l,owcver, the ox'cli.nancc has bee.n chang;e~;d< A1so, tha bu~il.cli.ng permS.t: f:ee was reLunded to r~ir. ~30YCISF?Tl. i~lr. 12usch sCaCed t:h~t he purchased Che property with Che inCent: of bu:i7.ding a dupl.ex. 11i,iscJz stated Chat: at the ti.me he ~urcl~iased t_he property, the 13ui1.cli.ng Lnspect:or L'e1t it was a.in i.de11. Locati.on for a du~lex. Ru.,ch ,CatEd Chat he pu7.7.ed the perrnit for a duplex rxnd tl~en because 1nCerest r..ites 41ent sicy-higki, he di.d noC hui.ld. t~7r. Rusch Fe~1t tl~~at zi nice home woul.d improve tne area. Nir, i'ahey sC:~ted th~.i[ itr. J.Zusc6 onl.y had 1.20 days ii~i whi-ch [o act on his building pexm:it: and poincc~d out: that Clie pec~ait fee was ref.uTidecl. Fahey sCated thaC Cliere is no bas~.i.s for ~rztntlfat:her~ r.~i.;hc, i.n tl~iis case and f.e'.Lt: thaC the R-1 zoni.n,~, appl.:i.ed. ttr. Rusch sC~it:ed tlleit i.f he c~nnot build a duolex on t:he property, he coould proba~ly I,trave to move an ol.der home onCO the l.ot. Mr>. Sca1z~ poi.nred out that thE home woulc( have to comply wiik~ Ci.ey ord~inances. Mr. 1'ti.iscli f:elt tPiat, thi., property sl~iould kiave a trunsi_tionel. zon~~~. ~irs. 9ca:Lze fe1.t that a rezonin~ zaould be spot zonin~. rv(r. 3lesener pointv~d out that tPie propcrCy i.s surroundec{ on t:hree side, by it-1. i'[r. Pahey inLor.rnecl A~,ir. Rusch th<at che City iic7.d a puSli.c hearing on the 'L in 10 prov~isi.on and there was no one objeatin~; Co th:is provisi.on bein~; removed irom Che ordinancee Pat~cy sC~Ced thaC iS the Council granted ehe ]?usch rezoning reGuest, anyone ~.in a si.ngl.e f:ami,ty area woulc'I k~ave Che ri.ght to request ttie ssme thin~;. Mrs. I,uci.11F Lal3ore and t4r„ Lo~is L,aFlore stated that they were opposed to the rezoninf;, Mrs. Nardi_ni. -introduce.ct ch<~~ fol.low~i.nn rFSO1uC3.on and movect i.CS adopti.on: RIiSOLIJ'PION ~IO. <b°~-4-190 -- A RI3SOL[J'CION C,L,OSSNC 'C'fi.F: Pi713LIC i~1EARf,AG OI~ T'1~IL; 130RDSI:;~7 'PROPC?R'CY Rl7,OP]I~~6 Ri3(UF?S1' 7'he [oirep,oing resolution ~vas duly seconded by P4r. Cotlova. Ayes (5) Nsrdi.n~i, Collova, S~,al.ze, Alesener, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resol~.iCion declared ~tcloZ~tad. 'Chis resolutl.on ~a~~pears i.n 'tesol.uti.on 73ook Dlo. 12, Pave 189, page, _9_