06-12-85 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINU7'I;S Ci.Cy Counc:il June 12, 19t35 Uel3ace/ Mr. Fahey commentecl that his only concer.n was if Che Ci.Cy wou].cl be 'I,i.l.~;e proCecCeci under a PUD agreement ehat Che l.ots wou]_d be combined i.n (Cone.) Che f'uture. I~akiey also aslcecl i.f Che CiCy i.s responsi.ble Lor provi.di.ng access to the Co17.ova pro~ecty located tin the baek. Mr. Charles Collova stated t:~at Lhere caas a?_0 f.ooC cartway easement to his property. The City Clerl,c stated that the easerner~t appears on Che section maps and i.t is I.ocaCed on CiCy property. Pahey askecl iE ?1r. Co ll.ova coulcl usc: thaC easement tor access to his ~roperCy. Th~ Ci.Ly AtCOrney repli.ecl C.h2t he would have to research thc records to determine this. 'Che Attorney also pointed out that i.P the Collova pcoperty i.s already ].andl.ocked, the De.Bace/7.i.l.ge plat woul.d not be fur.therin~ Chi.s sltuaCion. The Attorney did not Eeel. Chat the City would h~ve to reyui.re access to Cl~e Collova properCy throup,h Che Ucl3ace/Zil.g,e pl~t. Pahey questi.oned i.f. Che ceirtway easement: would be adequate access for ilr. Col.].ovei. 'Che Attorney replied that tie di.d not lazow and would resear.ci~ this. Pahey aslced the AtCOrney thaC assumi.ng the cartway easemenC ~is there~ was lie sati.sf.i.ed that there was access. The Attorney repli.ed thaC he was sati.sLi.ed. Mrs. Scalze ast<ed if the City would get itself in a situaC~iori by appr.~oving Chi.s PUll of havi.ng res~idential. propert~ies x•equest YUD's in order to construct a second house on the baci< of properCies. Scalze poinCed o~it that the Counc:i.l has ~one over Ctiis poi.nC many times be.Eore. Nardin-i. e~,lced i.P a second ~uildi_ng could be put: on Outlot D. 'Lhe Ylanner replied that :iL M~r. DeBe~ce coulcl fi.C i.t: in and provi.de requireci perlci.ng, he could do it. nlr.. 3lesener =~oi_nted out that i.n the Gordy Ilowe siCUati.on, ,Ir. [lozac. had t~ao princi~l.e owners involved, and Mr. Del3ace i.s talking abouC one o~oner.. Mr. Collova added that Mr. tlowe also lacked square footr.ige. 'LPie ACf:orney statecl ehat: the City could cover. i.n a devel.oper's agree- ma~nt thaC at the tirne ttte mortg~ges were sati.st:ied, the l.ots woul.d be combinecL 'fhe agreemenT, would be recorded a~ainst the abstr.acC of the pr.operti.es and the si.tuati.on would have Co be pol.i.ced. Pnhcy poinCCd out Chai: both lots woulcl be owned by one paxcy and there would be one pr~inc~iple use i.nvol.ved. Kr.. De}3ace commented Cha~ the City's l~i.censing program would hel.p enEorce the s:it~.iation. Pahey statecl that i.t woul.d be cleaner tor Che CiCy to have a;;econd bui.l.di.ng on OuClot [). P1r. Detiace replied t:hat he di.d not ttiinlc Chere was enough room on Outlot U with access and parici.r~p, requisernenCS thaC would have to be met. Page -4-