Laserfiche WebLink
'1IAIU'T1iS <br />Ci.ty Councit <br />Atigust 1.4, 1985 <br />~conomi.c The foregoi.n~ r.e,olut.i.on wus duly secondecl oy N1r. Blesener. <br />DevelopmenC Ayes (5) Co1l.ova, t3lesener, :lardin:i., Scalze, Fahey. <br />CommiCC~ze Nayes (0). <br />(Cont.) P.esoluCi.on declaced ac{opted. <br />'Chi, resol.uCion appears i.n Resolution Book No. 17, Page 392. <br />Council d~i.scussed the fact ChaC there i.s a mi;understtinding by the <br />busi.ness comm~mi.ty that Che Cowlcil. i.s ant~.i-t~~usiness. t~(r. Fahcy <br />f:elC thaC this came about sahen t:he C:i.ty be~;zzn enforci.nf; f ir.e codes. <br />Fahey al,o commented that Che Counci.l. wants to promote a goocl <br />busi.ness cli.mate. i.n the City. The econom:ic developmenk committee <br />w:i.11 be 2~ood way of. Iceepi.n~; Che lines of. communieat~l.on open. <br />City 'Phe City Clerl< pre,enCed to the Counc:il. an e,t~i.mat:ion of: the Cit:y's <br />Pinance cost ~>arti.ci.pati.on in [he LiCtle Canada Roacl bridge j~~rojecC. 'I'he <br />Of. City's esCimated cosC ca~i.7.1 be $46,690 from I,ittle Canada i4SA funcls <br />Im~rovements and $39,364 f'rom MSA reserve funds. <br />Agenda 7'he Clcrlc stressed that thi.s was just an est_i.mate and the Ci.ty wi.l.l <br />Item No. 11. Icnow Che actual costs i.n February. <br />'Che Clerl< po-i.nted out that Che CiCy wil.l not have Co l.evy any taxes <br />to cover these costs and Chey will be hand].ed from MSA Eunds. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the fo7.lo~v:i.ng resotuti.on and moved i.ts adopti.on: <br />RGSOI,U'CION N0. IIS-8-388 - ACCEPTTNG 'CI-Lli PRELINIDlAItY <br />COST ES'CIMA'LIi POR CITY YAR'I.'ICIPATION IN 7'HE LI7.'TL,L' <br />CANADA ROAD T3RIDCE PROJIiCI' <br />7'he f:oregoi.ng resol.uti.on was duly seconded by P1r. Collova< <br />Aycs (5) Sc~1ze, Collova, Nardini_, Fahey, I3lesener. <br />~ayes (0). <br />Resol.uti.on cleclared adopted. <br />Th~is resolution ~~ppears in Reso].uCion Boolc No. 12, Page 393, <br />~1rs. Nar.di.ni asl<ecl if: the Ci.ty was int:erested in a concrete waltcway <br />on tl~e south si.de of: I.,itCl.e Canada Road. The Cler.tc poi.ntecl out thaC. <br />thc path on th~ north side i, ~really only a bike path. <br />Pahey risked i.f: th~ path was di.scussed ~dith the residents on Che souCh <br />si.de. The Cl.erk stat~d that he ctid not: lcnow wl~at was discussed wi.Ch <br />the property owners. <br />Nlrs. Sc~lze poirited out Chst there wi11 be childr~~~n using botLi sides <br />oE the street. )?ahey commented t1~at a si.ciewalk shoul.d s;o :i.n on Che <br />~'21~(: -12- <br />