Laserfiche WebLink
MINU1'ES <br />City Council <br />Oct. 9, 19£35 <br />Kath Storm P1r. Van Hoven then infor.med the Cotmcil. Chat he has checked o~ith Che <br />Sewer. (Cont.) County and there is no record ot easemerits f.or the di.tch on his peoperty. <br />A1so, the City Clerlc does not have the easemenCS. Van t~loven stated that <br />Cechnically the City does not have an easement for [he clitch on his <br />property nor his nei~hboes, <br />'i'l~e City ~lerk reported thaC he is in the process of. checlcing this out <br />with the former. City Attorney. <br />Van tloven stated that t:he people in the area petitioned for tliis ditch, <br />UuC di.d not realize that the City would be bringi.ng the water form the <br />street into the d:itch. <br />Pahey stated that the City should hot have put: in Che ditch ~oithout <br />easements. Pahey sCated that he was noC :in favor of doing anything <br />else in this area unti.l Che ea,ement si.tuatlon i;; cLeared up. <br />Mr. Van tloven stated that he w:i.1.1 not be easy to work wi.th on the easement <br />until the probLem at the other end is talcen care of. <br />I~ahey commented that the City should not all,ow any more fi.Lli.ng i.n P4r. <br />Van tloven's b~clc yarci or any oE the nei_ghbors unti.l the easement i.s <br />taken care of. Pahey sta[ed that the City cannot all.ow che problem <br />Co be compounded until. tkte drai.nage si.tuation is wor.lced out. <br />Van Hoven stated that he d:Lct not i.ntend to fi11 baclc to wki~t he thought <br />wasthe easement. <br />Pahey suggested that the Pngineer ].oolc at Che situat:i.on and repor.t back <br />in Cwo weetcs. The I:ngineer reported Chat he eaill bri.ng i.n a map of.` the <br />area and show where all the water flows. The Lngineer stated that there <br />ar.e about 20 acres draining into this area. <br />Van tloven stated that ori.gi.nalLy a].l this property did not drain i.nto <br />thi.s area. <br />Scalze asked if the swale ever sol.ved Che problem for the area. P]r< Phi.l.l.ips <br />stated that the ditch never worked. Phillips also stated ttiat the siphon <br />is a bad situation. <br />Fahey suggested that the Engineer get Y.he contractor to correct Che pr.oblem <br />ouCl.ined earlier by fAr. Van Hoven wi.th regar.d Co the standi.ng water. <br />Van lloven stated t:hat tkie ditch is the highest point i.n hi.s backyard< <br />Water cannot floor pasC hi.s backyard. <br />:ahey asked if the fi11 Van Eloven is brin~;i.ng in wi.11 i.nterfere with Lhe <br />drai.nage area. Van Hoven replied Chat it wi11 not. Van tloven also <br />poi.nted out: that the pipe on the Kath pr.operty forms a three foot barri.er. <br />and he believes thi.s property G11.IL be fi.l.led to Che level o£ the pipe. <br />Page -14- <br />