Laserfiche WebLink
MT.NU'LES <br />Ci.ty Counci.l <br />Oct. 9, 19£35 <br />19f36 Audit Mr.. Fahey recommended that thc 1956 Audi.t Agreement Ue approved wi.th <br />Agreement the foll.owinf; ckianges in salar.ies: Semi-Seni_or Staf:f. Audi.tors - <br />$30.75 per hour; Junior Staff Aud~.itors - y'L6.50 per. hour. Pahey <br />A;enda comment:ed that this wi.l.l bri.n~; the sal.ari.es within a 6% increase <br />Ztem No. 16 gui.deline. <br />Mr. i3lesener stated that the avera~;e i.ncrease :i.s within the 6% Li.gure <br />and fel.t that the proposal. was no different than what the C:i.ty had <br />done wi.th its employees by i.ncreasing some salaries more than other.s. <br />Mr. Fakiey introetuced the following resoluti.on and moved iCS adoption: <br />RGOLUT:CON N0, 85-10-504 - AAPP.OVING TIIE <br />1986 AIJI)TT AGRL.IiMENT WSTH ADJIJSTMGNI'S :CN <br />SALARIGS AS OUTLSNi?D IiV ORDLR TO BRING <br />SALAR:[PS WI'LtIIN A 6% INCRI?,ASL' Gi)IUI,LINP. <br />Tiie foregoing resolution was cluly seco~ided by Ms. Nardi.ni. <br />Ayes (3) Pahey, Nardi.ni.,Scalze. <br />Nayes (1) 131esener. <br />Resoluti.on declared adopted. <br />'Phis resol.ution appears i.n Resolution I3oolc No. 12, Page 526. <br />Prudenti.<al - Mr, Pahey introducecl the following resolution and moved i.ts adopti.on: <br />Additi.onal <br />~.Investor. RESOLUTTON N0. 85-10-505 - APPROVING PR[JDIsN'LIA7, <br />AS A~ ADDITIONAL INVCSTOR POR 'Ct{E C~LTY <br />Agenda <br />item No. 17 The foregoing resoluCion was duly seconded by Ms. Nardini. <br />Ayes(4) Iahey, Nardini, Blesener, Scalze. <br />Nayes (0). <br />This resoluti.on appears in Itesolut~ion I3ook No. 12, Pag;e 527. <br />tiusi.ness The Ci.ty Clerlc suUgested that the Council continue to receive more <br />llevelopment applicat:ions f:or the I3usiness DevelopmenC Comm:i.ttee bef.ore talcing any <br />Committee act:i.on, <br />Agenda C4r. ill.esener astced the Council's i.ntentions for the Committee. <br />Item No. 1F3 Pahey replied that he felt the hlayor should serve on the Cormni.ttee along <br />~vith a Councilmember. Fahey su~;~ested that Council particip.:ition on <br />the Committee could Ue rotated on a year.ly basis. <br />P9r. 731esener. felt that two people from the Counci.l. were sufficienC. <br />F31.esener also felt Chat the Committee should be no larger than 7 or £3e <br />131esener sug;ested Cwo or three people from the Chamber of Commer.ce, <br />some business owncrs and someone from the pubLic-at-].arf;e should <br />mal<e up the Committee, S3lesener Lelt that the CommiCtee should not <br />be chaired by a member ot the Council. <br />Yage -16- <br />