10-23-85 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iQINUTES Ci[y Councll Oae. ?.3,_ 1985 Car.ciinal Pahe.y stat~d that he was agceeab le to the or:i.~ina1 proposal. if i.t Propeety i.ncoc'porated the 6dinCer pr.operty and lefC that proper,ty as a~uf.ter (Cont.) to Iona Lane. Pahey stated that as far ~s he ~vas concerned 192 aparCmenC units would not fly. l~alley also suggested Chat Mr. T2utri.ck loolc irito anoCher access to Ri.ee Street. 1:4r. 1Zut:r.i.ck i.nformed tY~e Co~inci.l tk~at the Wi.nCers wi11 only sel.l him the t>ack portion of thei.r. ~~roperty i.f, they can get the front: port-i.on rezoned to canmercial. Fahey Eel.t that thi.s was a r.eal:isti.c use of Chc. fronC of Che properCy. l~ahey then informed 12utziclc th~it he would li.ke to see the nurnber of apartmenC uni.ts to thaC of the ori~inal. proposal or el.se some t:ype of townhouse devel.opment< Fahey stated thaC he coul.d not support upzon:i.ng f:he Wi.nter properey for apartments. Mr. Co Ll.ova sCated that he woulcl just as soon see~ a t:hird oLfice buil.di.n~; rather than a thi.rd apartment bui.ld~i.nq;. k2uCZi.clc staCed that t~e ~ooul.d have Co be able to lesisc the of.Eice s~ace out und thi.s would be mo~re of a problem Chan leasinQ the apartment space. t4rs. Sca~lze stat:ed that she d:i.d not heli.eve that apartrnent:s wer.e the only thi.n; Chat was leasable in I~ittl.e Canada. ~1rs. Scalze poi.nCec1 out ~hat a nei.ghborhood heari.nf, wil.l have to be held on Chis development, Ri.rtzi.clc sCaCed that he was loolcino for ap~roval. of. the public hEari.ng so that lte ce~n conti.nue on w~i.th the devcl.opr~ent process. Mr.. Pahey suggesCed tt~at D9r. Rutzick noC s~end a lot of money on the proposal with the W:inter ~copeety as is, as ~it will. not fly wi.th the Counc:i.l. itutzi.ck staCed thzlt the Wi.nters wi.ll not ,e ll. to him unless they ,et the front: of theis property rezoned. Pahey s~ated that l1e preferr~d to ].oolc aY. the Lront ot the prope.rtq <znd deci.de how far baclc Ctie commerci.al zonin~ should rmi, Fahey suggested that Lhe Iona Lane peopl.e be cal1.ed l.Cl. 7'al~e.y also sCaCed that he is not prepaeed Co act oei the proposal i[ iY: does noC include the back porCion o.f. the 4d:i.nt:er properCy. A representative of Piper Jaf:Lery recommended that t:he publ.i.c hearing be called [or and i1r, Rutz~.ick would come in wiCh glans aC that ti.me, Ily ca1l.i.ng a public hea~r.i.ng Chc Counci.l i.s not grant:i.n~+ any approvals< Pahey poinCed out that i.f. the project is turned down a l.ot of money ori.1.1 have been ;pent for nothi.ng. t4r. Rutzi.ck replied that he had taith that the matter coul.d be worked out. Page -7-