Laserfiche WebLink
~~izn~uTEs <br />c;ty co~,n~;7 <br />July 2, 19~3fi <br />f~s, Plardini in~Croduced the folloering resolutionand movad its adoption: <br />RFSOLU7zON h~0. f36-7-295 - rLOSTPIG 7~IE <br />PU[;LIC I-IEFIRIDI~ OP! INi~R01~Ei~i[:I~IT n0. 86-11 <br />The foregoinn resolucion was duly seconded by iir. Pahey. <br />!lyes (Ei) (~larcfini, Fahey, ~lesener, Collova, Scalze. <br />IJays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />7his reso7~rtion ap~ears in Resolution 300!< Lo. 15, Page '9S. <br />1=rani< Graczke asked if it woulci be morE feas~ible to improve <br />Dernont Co resi<lential stanclards and not designate the roac: as <br />Stat:.,-Fli d. <br />The City Fli.~ditor stated that by not designating Der~ont State-(iid, <br />~the Ci ty vroi.al d 10~~~ about $700,000 i n State-Ai cf fundi ng, ~rhi ch <br />i ncl udes fundi ng for the starrn se~aer al ong Deriiont. <br />Sanc3ra Cascy ask~d ii- Cit,y-oamecl praa~rty alonq the proposed <br />improvements tvould be assessed, <br />The nuditor replie<( that assessments are calci.ilated as if all <br />~arcels are assessed. <br />Casey stated that she ~~tas 100°% in favor of Lhe improve,neni;s. <br />~ir. Steele ~uestioned ~r~hy tti~ cost of tne improvements r.ould not <br />be pui; on general taxation. <br />Fahey commented that storm sey~ier iroprovements ~;ai11 be out on <br />qenera1 taxation, but 98~ of the City's storm ~,ia.ter ends up <br />in Lake Gervais and, thereforn, storm atater 9s a problem, that <br />is coromon to the ~;~hole City. Fa{ie_y pointed out thai, the cost <br />of street i~rinrovern^nts s•iill be assessed 80°~ to the prop~rty <br />o~~ner and 20% wil~l be put on neneral taxation. <br />~aheV stated that he fr.~lt the Deinont irnprove!nent; frotn Rice Street <br />to 35f~ atas nFeded and necessary. ~=ah~y sugnestec,i tnat C'ne Lake <br />Street, East Rose Place ancll_a<eshore imurover.ieni,s be tab1ed as <br />the pro~>erty o~rners may not have br:.en ~deqiaately inf~,rm^d on 4:~ie <br />cost of these irsiprovea~ent. Fahey also suggested that the Carl<x <br />Lane 9mprovement be tablecl for furl:ner discussion. <br />7he City Cler'~c point~d out tha.t the stre~tsscn2ciulec! for overlav <br />are not included as part of the hond issue sche<haled for July 2~, <br />hoviever, ~the other irnprovernents proposed tonigi~t are ancl shoulc; <br />be acted on. <br />Page -11- <br />