Laserfiche WebLink
~iI"dUTES <br />City Council <br />Oct. £3, 192& <br />`~i nutes <br />(Cont.) <br />On nagr 7, ttie salary set for the Senior Citizen <br />Coordinator aias 5165.00 per month for 19£37, <br />P~ir. }3lesener introduced the follo~,dinq resolution and moved its adontinn: <br />RFSOLUTtO~i ~JO. 56-10-426 - APPROVIAIG <br />TFIF ~~IFIU'fCS 01= THE OCT03ER 1, 19~36 <br />tdORKSHOP ~'E~'tING ,~S CORRFCTFD <br />Sylvan <br />Street <br />Improve~nent <br />,4genda <br />ItEra No. 4- <br />7he foragoing resolution ~r~as c!uly secondecl Uy i1r. Collava. <br />#~yes (5) Blesener, Collova, Scalze, Nardini, Fatiey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Tni s resol ~rti on appears i n Re ,ol uti on 13004; No. 15, Pac?e ~97. <br />P1ayor Fahe,y o~~ened the Pu~~lic ilearing on the irnprovement of S.ylvan <br />Street from County Road C to [)emont hy grading, sanitary se~~ier, <br />~~~at~rmain, storm sewer, bitu~ninous surface and concrete curb and <br />gutter. Fahey pointed out that this is a continuation of a hearing <br />from a nrevious Council meeting. <br />The City l~ngineer reported that ~13°!~ of the propei°ty oa~rners involve<t <br />have petitioned for the improvement ofi Sylvan. The ~ngineer reported <br />tViat costs of the improvement rrported at ttie llugust 13, 19i35 meeting <br />u~ere estimates. I3ids svere ~aken on tne improvement and tha costs <br />based on tYie loo~ bid are $166.00 per front foot, or ~12,450 for a 75 <br />foot lot. Gstirnate<l costs reported at thr August 13 meeting ~,~ere <br />~1(33 per front foot. The !:ngineer reported that if Lake Street <br />~;rere vacated, there would be 120 feet of ad<19tional frontage to <br />assess bringinc~ the cost dob~n to $156 per front foot, or ~,11,700 <br />for a 75 foot 1 o C. <br />P%ir. Doug Day, 2540 Spruce Street, asked if the Engine~r considered <br />including this project i•~ith otnr_rs in the City in ord2r to brinq <br />costs clo~,m furtti~r. Th2 Cnqineer replied that this has been done <br />and the result is the cost reported, <br />Scalze pointed out tliat on ~ugust 13, t'ne cost for a 75 foot lot <br />svas reported at $13,736. Therefore, the a11,700 is quite a savinc!s. <br />Day asl:eci if the City ~aould v~lcate L~ke Street. <br />I"ahey r~plieci that a portion of La!ce Strec~t has already been <br />vacated. The vacation :~roulcl b~ ~~ srnarate issue considered at <br />a public hearing. <br />Fahey reported that it 'nas been nast Council policy to orcier <br />improvements ~~ihen at least 50% of the property o+>mers involvec! <br />are in favor of t'ne improvement. <br />Page -2- <br />