Laserfiche WebLink
s~~rNUrr_s <br />City Council <br />Mov. 2h, 19J6 <br />P1cCulloch but rather to prov~ide a facility for the ~r.ore advancecf s~udents. <br />CUP (Cont.1 <br />Fahey indicated that he did no~; have an objection to the P4cCuiloch <br />requ2st, provided that the existing prob1ems on the site are corrected. <br />fioa~aev^r, ~'ahey poi ntec! out that tne matter needs to be tabl ed to <br />qive the Planner an opnorti.inity to revie~z~ the site plan and t~ir, <br />i^c'',ulloch an opnortunity to r.orrect existing problems. <br />P9r. Fahey introduced the folloa~iny resoliation and movecl its adoption: <br />RESOLUTI~v DI~J. 85-11-505 - 7A1~LI~!6 F1~TIOM1! OPI <br />THF.. P4cCULLOCN COP~IDI7IOt~lAL USE PERMIT i-OR Tb10 <br />~;lLFI<S IN ORDER TO ALL~4! ~~1R. P1cCUf~~OCN F1h1O TFIE <br />PL.~PdPdER TO REVIkIJ 71Ir SITF PL.I1P! AD1D RES01_VG <br />TfiE DIF~ICULTTES OUTLI~lLD IN TIiE PIRiVN~R'S <br />REPORT DATE~ MOVEP~iBER 24, 1986 <br />The forec~oing resolut.ion ~vas d~aly seconded hy ~~irs. Sca1ze. <br />tl,yes (51 Fahey, Scalza, Collova, idarclini, [31~sener. <br />Plays (Q). <br />Rc~solution declar~d adopt2ct. <br />This resolution appears 9n Reclolution f3oo'r. ^lo. 15, Page &1?_. <br />Cellular f1r. Fahey opened the public hearing on the proposad text amendment <br />One ~ratiich ~~iould allo~i construc~ion of antenna facilities ior essentia1 <br /> services in Industria1 zones, as well a.s t he public hearinq on i:iie <br />Agenda Cellul~r One request for constri~ction of a cellular te1ephone <br />Ttem ~lo. 3 transrni ssi on faci 1 i ty i ncl iacli ng a 200-foot to~,ver. <br />Fahey pointed out that the Planninq Coi~nnission tabled action on these <br />matters pencling receipt of a<leta~led site nlan for Cellular One as <br />~~~el 1 as the Donovan Construct:i on bui 1 di nq adcii ti on anri i n orcier to <br />give the Commission an onportunity to look at similar Co~,~er sites. <br />The Planninn, Commission also felt that ti~e !doodlyn Flvenue issue <br />should be resol~ied prior to grantincr additional building permits in <br />this areae <br />iir. !~;arren Spann~is, attorney representing the Minnesota Cellular <br />1'elephone Con2pany also !<nok~n as Cellular One, appPared hefore th~ <br />Council. Spannus pointed out tha't at t'ne Planning Comm'ission meeting <br />19rs, Ti~rnnons stated that t'ne Planning Commission agrees s~~t'th th~ <br />Celli.ilar On:r, proposa1, but mentions that the roacl problem has been <br />yoing on for a period of time. <br />Spannus s~ated that Ce1lular One is ~dilling to cooperal:^ in the <br />resol uti on of th~ road proi~l em and woul cl be avi 11 i n~ i:o sharE i n the <br />assessrnent;s for the road. <br />Spannus further pointed oi~t that the Cel1ular Onc~ proposal does not <br />havF~ road frontane and is for a transrnission faci1ity that is unmanned. <br />Page -10- <br />