Laserfiche WebLink
r~z~~u~r~s <br />c; ty co~an~; 7 <br />~lov. 26, ~19~3fi <br />C~11 ul ar It ~~as poi n1:etl out tV~at the tos~fer woul ci be 1 ocated about 4~~ ~fcet <br />~ne (Cont.) froin the Garvais oroperty line. <br />~~s. ~~ardini introduced CYi~ fol1or~inc~ resoli~rtion anc! ~fiioveci its adoption: <br />ftCS4LUTIf1Pl tJO. Ba-11-506 - CLOSIPIG TFI[ <br />PUE3LIC FIEARI~IG 0~I TFiF TEXT AP~iF..PdDP~1,F,.p17 Al~LOl~dIN(, <br />TMF C~FISTRUCTION OF ~P1TEPlhJ,4 Ft1CIl_ITIES ~Ok <br />ESScP~TTAI_ S!'RUIr,rS IP! IilDIISTf?IAl lO~IES <br />The foregoing resolution ~,vas di~i1y seconded by P~lr. [Slesener. <br />Ayes (5) P,larcfini, r;lesener, Scalze, Collova, Fahe/. <br />Nays (~). <br />Resolution dcclared adoptecl. <br />7his resolut'ion aopears in I2esolution f;ook D!o. 15, Pac!e c13. <br />Pirs. Scal zr poi nted out that the proposal avou7 cl res~.~l t i n tt~fo <br />princinal uses on one pi~ce of nroperty and traditionally, t'ne Cit,y <br />has not allo+~~~c! this. <br />7he Planner felt that the proposal ti~ias diffr~rent than t~r~o b~isinesses <br />on a lot anc! pointed out that the Celliilar One proposa.l is an <br />uniuann~d facility. 7he Pla.nner also stated that the raquas~t is <br />5ei ng handl ed urider a?UD as i f pronerty were di vi <ie~ i t ti~!oul d <br />require road. frontage, ~,ahich is not necessarily appropriate in <br />this case. <br />Scalze pointEd out that nin~i-storages are also handled uncier a <br />PUD fior these same reasons, and that the City does not ;ji.ist 9rant <br />?U~)'s in order to alloar t~vo bi.isiness~s to use one piece of oroperty. <br />~lardini pointecl out that th~ proposal includes a 2£; foot hy 12 foot <br />buil~ing e~rhich could 'oe rented out hy someone else. <br />"~?r. Oxley, represent~ing Cellular OnF, reported that the lease agreemani: <br />Cel l ul ar One has ~,~i tii Donovan Constructi on i s onl y for Cel l i.i1 ar One. <br />I'a4iey statnd that thi s coul d be r,~adA nart of the PUD A,c!reement. <br />Fahe,y stated t:hat Yia had no problem !•~ith the ter,t amendrnent, but <br />pointecl out that the Planning Comrnission has tablecl action on it <br />until their next meeting. <br />Pqr. Collova f~lt the Ce11u1ar one proposal was a good use of the <br />property. <br />(~1esener nointed out t1~at ;just nortki o~f tiiis property are a lot <br />of posver lines. 131esener asked if the to.-~er hatl to be red and <br />sdhite as similar ~tovr°rs hE has seen. <br />Pagn -1'- <br />