Laserfiche WebLink
r~z~dUTFS <br />City Coianci1 <br />Nov. 26, 19f3€~ <br />Sophie The fore~7oing resolution was duly seconded by ~1r. Collova. <br />tlssessment Ayes (5) r"ahey, ~ollova, Nardini, Scalze, rles2ner. <br />(Cont.) Plays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution E3onk Plo. 15, Page fi0£3. <br />Ilanson f~1r. Fahey oo~neci tne nublic hearing on th^ request of Iidele lianson <br />Property and Ray ESanson for a sicte yarc.t setbac!: variance for an existing <br />Di~iision house and a lot split for their property located at 3001 Vanderbie <br />Road. <br />F~qencia <br />Item ~~lo. fi Fahey po9ntecl out that the Planninc,~ Commission recommended approval <br />of the request contingent uoon meeting the Planner's recommandations <br />containetl in his t•lovember 4, 19~6 report. <br />Pahey also pointed out that the Planner indicates in his report <br />that the existing right-of-~va.y for Allen Avenue is Fi6 feet, E,~nich <br />is in excess of current Code requirement of 50 feet for residential <br />streets. <br />Scalze suggested that rath^r than grant a variance, the City should <br />vac~te a portion of tne Allen 1lvenue right-of-aaay. Etlesener and <br />Nardini agreec!. <br />The Planner pointed oiat t'nat it might be costly and time consuminc~ <br />to go up and doti~m 1111en Avenue vicatincl right-of-way. <br />~ahey agreed that it 4aould cost the City a lot of money in engineering <br />and legal costs. <br />The Planner also pointed out that the variance is beinn requestecf <br />for the home that is already existinq. <br />Fahey also pointed out that the buyer of the n24vly created lot vri11 <br />be aware of the varianc~. <br />P~1r. Ray Hanson reportFd ~hat Yie i s i n agre~rnent ~~i th the recominendati ons <br />of the City P1anner. !ianson also pointed out 'that this svou1d he the <br />only undeveloped 1ot in the area. <br />~ General Public <br />o correction There ~vas no one frori the a~+cri~+~Ee wishing to be heard on this matter. <br />Res. no. 86-11-52£3 <br />ftr. Blesener introducecl the follotving reso1ution and move~! its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIOh ~10. £36-11-.502 - CLf1SI~dG TFIE <br />PUBLIC HFFlRIPdG OPI TIiE °ftOPOSED IIAPlSON PROPFRTY <br />DIVISION <br />T4ie Por~goina resolution was du1y seconded by Mr. ~ahe,y. <br />Aye, (5) ~lesener, Fahey, Collova, Plardini, Scalze. <br />~lays (0). Resoliation declared adopt~d. <br />This resolution appears in Reso1ution ~ool< ~Uo. 15, Page f09. <br />PaGe -7- <br />