My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-87 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
04-22-87 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:34:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:51:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />City Council <br />April 22, 1987 <br />Bingo Wylie stated that he assumed that if Finnerty's and Tschida's presence <br />(Cont.) on the Board is illegal, LCCB will be told so. <br />Wylie stated that the letters of March and April are the Board's <br />means of identifying individuals involved with the lease and <br />determining whether Qoard members are involved in carrying out <br />gambling. Wylie stated that the Board is not involved either <br />directly or indirectly in the conducting of gambling. <br />Fahey stated that the City wants the Gambling Board to tell us <br />whether the Hall Association is legal. <br />Wylie stated that he, too, would like this information. tdylie stated <br />that if the concern was to get the matter of leases and negotiation <br />of leases out of the hands of LCCB, this function could be placed in <br />the hands of a trustee or real estate agent. Wylie reported that <br />LCCB owns a lease and has a right to a building for a two-year <br />period. This has been decided by the courts and is in place. <br />These rights could be tr~nsferred to a trustee. The Association <br />could be removed as landlord if that is the State's wishes. However, <br />at this point the State Gambling Control Board is polling every <br />landlord in the State and Wylie assumed they would make a decision. <br />The question is whether LCCB will have the answer in time. <br />Fahey noted that it is the City Attorney's opinion that LCCB does <br />not comply with State law, including the participation of Bob <br />Finnerty on the Board. Fahey stated that until he is told differently <br />by the State Gambling Control Board, he did not feel that LCCB should <br />be allowed to operate. Fahey stated that he was disappointed that <br />the State would not issue an opinion, and felt that the State was <br />expecting too much from the City. Fahey felt that if the State <br />cannot issue an opinion, the City should not accept LCCB on blind <br />faith. The City Attorney states in his opinion the operation is <br />illegal and there is nothing contrary from the State. Fahey felt <br />that until an opinion is received from the State Attorney General <br />or Roger Franke, the licenses should be denied. <br />Fahey asked if the City Attorney's opinion has changed. <br />The City Attorney replied that in the absence of a ruling from <br />Roger Franke's office that the present organization complies <br />with State law, it is his opinion that it does not comply miith <br />State law. <br />Wylie pointed out that the City has requested an opinion be obtained <br />from the Attorney General's office, and Wylie was not sure LCCB had <br />the standing to obtain such an opinion. Wylie stated that if anyone <br />had this standing, the City did and apparently this process does not <br />happen overnight. Wylie felt that the request was unfair and that <br />impossible conditions are being placed on the license renewal. <br />Wylie reported that he understands and respects the concerns of <br />the City with regard to LCCB, but felt these concerns will be <br />Page -25- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.