My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-87 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
04-22-87 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:34:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:51:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />April 22, 1987 <br />Becker Lot The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr, Blesener. <br />Split Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener, Collova, LaValle, Fahey. <br />(Cont.) Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 166. <br />Becker pointed out that now that he has waited to split his <br />property he can't because the ordinance has changed. <br />Collova stated that many growing communities have 5 foot sideyard <br />setbacks as long as 15 feet is maintained between structures. <br />Collova did not feel that a 5 foot setback would negatively <br />effect the neighborhood. <br />Blesener stated that he would approve a 5 foot sideyard setback <br />if a 10 foot setback were maintained on the new lot. <br />Scalze felt that if this was done, the City's Codes should be <br />amended to provide for this. <br />Blesener stated that he would only be in favor of this in limited <br />situations. <br />The City Clerk suggested that the property be surveyed to determine <br />if P1r. Becker's measurements are correct. <br />Becker replied that they were correct. <br />Scalze stated that she was against the proposal and pointed out <br />that the Council has denied a number of variances in the past. <br />Scalze did not feel that Mr. Becker had been denied reasonable <br />use of his property, and pointed out that originally Mr. Becker <br />only wanted one house on the property and wanted to place that <br />house in the middle of the lot. <br />Fahey agreed with the Planner that there were no factual findings <br />to warrant granting a variance. Fahey pointed out similar instances <br />where the City has denied variances. Fahey did not feel the City <br />should make a departure from past precedent in this case. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-4-154 - APPROVING THE <br />BECKER LOT SPLIT AND FIVE FOOT SIDEYARD <br />SETBACK VARIANCE AS REQUESTED DUE TO <br />TNE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY THAT WERE <br />PLACED ON TNE ORIGINAL BECKER HOME AND <br />THE ORDINANCE WHICH IS BEFORE THE COUNCIL <br />Page -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.