01-27-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Jan. 27, 1988 Announce- alesener• r•epor•ted that ther~e will be a meeting of the Recycling Committee ments with local r~efuse hauler•s on Febr•uar~y 2, 1988 at 9:30 A.M. to discuss (Cont.) ways of r~educing the cost of gar~bage pick-up for~ local r~esidents. Blesener• invited any inter•ested Councilmember• to attend that meeting. Text Fahey opened the public hear•ing to consider• amending Section 903.050.D.8.k. Amendment by r•equi r•i ng pavi ng of al l par~ki ng 1 ots wi th mor•e than thr~ee par~ki ng Paving Of stalls in commer•cial, industr•ial and multi-famil,y zoning distr•icts. Parking Lots Fahey pointed out that the City Planner~ has r•ecommended that par~king lots of five spaces or• mor•e be r~equir•ed to be paved, while the Planning Agenda Commission has r•ecommended that par•king lots of thr•ee spaces or• mor•e Item No. 5 be paved. The Planning Commission's r~ecommendation would include multi-family residential development. The Planning Commission also felt it should be left to the discr~etion of the Quilding Inspector~ whether• or~ not the City Engineer• needed to r•eview the par•king lot plans for• residential development. The Or•dinance r•equir~es the Engineer• to r•eview par•king lot plans for~ commer•cial and industr•ial development. Ther•e was no one pr~esent fr~om the qener•al public wishing to comment on this matter. Mr•. Blesener~ intr•oduced the followin~ r•esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTIOP! N0. 88-1-21 - CLOSIfJ6 THE PUBLIC HEARING COMSIDERING THE PROPOSED TEXT APIENDMENT REQUIRIPIG THF PAVING OF PARKING LOTS The for~egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr~. LaValle. Ayes (5) Blesener•, LaValle, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Book ~lo. 19, Page 21. The Ci ty Pl anner~ r•epor•ted that he i s r~ecommendi ng the pavi ng of 5 par•ki ng spaces or~ mor~e as by r~educing the requir•ement down to 3 would include multi-family r•esidential development. Blesener reported that he viewed a duplex as a money-making operation with at least one side being rented out. Blesener• felt that the par•king ar~eas for• duplexes should be r•equir~ed to be paved. The Planner• noted that the way the or•dinance is wr~itten, if the City r•equir~es the paving of multi-family development par•king ar~eas, these areas will also be required to be curbed and striped. However, the Planner~ noted that the or~dinance can be fur•ther• amended to eliminate this r~equir~ement for• multi-family. Page -2-