Laserfiche WebLink
P9INUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 27, 1988 <br />Paisley The City Attor•ney submitted a letter~ dated Januar•y 13, 1988 outlinina <br />Easement payments that should be made r•elative to condemnation on Imp. No. 86-13. <br />Agenda Mr~s. Scalze intr~oduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Addition <br />RESOLUTIOPI ~IO. 88-1-33 - APPROVI~IG THE <br />PAYMEPJT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND ATTORNEYS <br />INVOLVED RELATIVE TO THE CONDEP9NATION ON <br />IMPROVEMENT N0. 86-13, LITTLE CANADA VERSUS <br />PAISLEY, ET AL, AS OUTLI~IED BY THE CITY <br />ATTORNEY IN HIS LETTER DATED J1~NUARY 13, 1988 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Fahey, LaValle, Collova, Blesener. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar~ed adopted. <br />This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 35. <br />Amending P1r•. LaValle r~epor•ted that it is necessar•y to amend the r~epayment <br />Viking str~uctur~e of the Viking Par•tner•ship Development Bonds of 1982. <br />Par•tner•shi p <br />Dev. Bonds P1r~. LaValle intr•oduced the followinq r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />Agenda RESOLUTI0~1 P10. 88-1-3~4 - AUTHORIZ.T~IG EXECUTION <br />Item ~lo. 18 AMD DELIVERY OF A SUPPLEP9EMTAL I~IDENTURE OF <br />TRUST RELATING TO THF $1,000,000 COMMERCIAL <br />DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS OF 1982 (VIKIPlG <br />PARTNERSHIP PROJECT) AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR <br />AND CITY CLFRK TO SIGM SUCH DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF <br />OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by P1r. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Blesener~, Collova, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br />This r~esolution appears in Resolution Book No. 19, Pages 36 and 37. <br />Employee Mr•. LaValle outlined var•ious quotations the City Cler•k has obtained <br />Health for~ City employees' health insur~ance cover•age. <br />Insurance <br />Blesener~ pointed out that some of the quotations ar~e based on a gr~oup <br />Agenda of 8 employees, and other•s ar~e based on 9 employees and 7 employees. <br />Ttem No. 18 Blesener• pointed out that the amounts being compar•ed ar~e not fair• <br />compar•isons due to this. <br />Blesener~ also suggested that befor~e the Council take action on employees' <br />health insur•ance, the City Cler~k speak to the employees effected to <br />determine their~ feelings on the matter~. <br />Page -21- <br />