Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 27, 1988 <br />Bank Shot <br />Billiards <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr•. Fahey intr•oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-1-27 - AMENDI~IG RESOLUTION <br />N0. 87-12-582 APPROVI~IG A CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT FOR BANK SHOT BILLIARDS, DECLARING <br />APPROVAL SUftJECT TO THE RECOMP~ENDATIONS OF <br />THE CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS REPORT DATED <br />DECEMBER 3, 1987 bIITH THE EXCEPTION TNAT THE MAXIMUM <br />AMOUNT OF AMUSEMENT DEVICES IS LIMITED TO FOUR AND <br />THAT CLOSING TIME IS SET AT 2 A.P1., tJITH THESE <br />CHANGES BEIPlG MADE DUE TO THE APPLICANT'S INTEREST <br />I~l COOPERATING WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE <br />PIAN~IING COMMISSION AND SUBJECT TO A REVIEW AT 120 <br />DAYS FROM THE DATE OF OPENING OF THE BUSINESS, <br />WITH CONSIDERATION TO BE GIVEN TO INCREASIPIG THE <br />HOURS OF OPEPATION A~1D NUMBER OF AMUSEMENT DEVICES <br />ALLOWED AT THAT TIP4E <br />~days (0). <br />Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br />This r~esolution appear•s in Resolution Qook No. 19, Pages 28 and ?.9. <br />The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Blesener~. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Planning Fahey r•epor~ted that the Planning Commission has asked for• clar~ification <br />Commission of the Council's ability to over•r•ule a Planning Commission r~ecommendation <br />Concer~ns without r•efer•r~ing the matter~ back to the Commission. <br />Agenda Fahey pointed out that occasionally the Council does disagr~ee with a <br />Addition r~ecommendation of the Planning Commission, but that in such instances <br />the Council is not r~equir•ed to send the matter• back to the Planning <br />Commission unless for• some r•eason the Or•dinance r~equir•es an amendment <br />or the matter requires further study. <br />Scalze r•epor•ted that she appr•eciates the amount of time the Planning <br />Commission spends discussing var•ious issues and this tliscussion as <br />contained in their meeting minutes decr•eases the amount of time the <br />Council has to spend r•eviewing a pr•oposal or• issue. <br />Collova pointed out that when a matter• is tabled by the Planning Commission <br />the Council cannot r•eview that matter~ for• 60 days or• until the Council <br />r•eceives a r•ecommendation fr~om the Planning Commission, whichever is <br />sooner•. <br />B1 esener~ stated that i f i t wer•e r•equi r•ed that both the P1 anni ng <br />Commission and the City Council had to completely agree on an issue <br />or• devel opment pr•oposal , ther~e ar~e some i tems that woul d never~ be <br />r~esol ved. <br />Page -8- <br />