My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-88 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
05-11-88 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:43:38 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:52:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 11, 1988 <br />Minutes Mr•s. Scalze intr•oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />(Cont.) <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 88-5-179 - APPROVING THE <br /> MINUTES OF THE APRIL 27, 1988 REGULAR <br /> COUNCIL MEETING AS CORRECTED <br /> The foregoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Collova. <br /> Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Blesener•. <br /> Nays (0). <br /> Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br /> This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 182. <br />Center•ville Scalze repor•ted that the Par~k Commission r•ecently held a special meeting <br />Road Ar•ea to r•eview par•k development concepts for• the Centerville Road ar•ea <br /> pr•oper•ty the City is pur~chasing and to make a r•ecommendation on the <br />Agenda amount of acr•eage the City should pur•chase. The Park Commission <br />Item No. 6 r•ecommended that the City pur•chase 12 acr~es of pr~oper•ty fr~om AIC <br /> Corpor~ation for a total park area of 33.88 acres. However, the Park <br /> Commission did not endor~se any par~ticular• development plan that was <br /> r•eviewed pending fur•ther~ study. <br /> Bill Sander~s appear•ed befor~e the Council to pr~esent development options <br /> for• the Center•ville Road ar~ea pr•oper•ty. Sander~s pointed out that the <br /> differ~ent acr•eage options include 25.92 acr~es, 29.9 acr~es or• 33.88 acr•es. <br /> If the City pur•chased 33.88 acr•es, ther~e would be 335 feet of pr~operty <br /> nor•th to Al1en that could be developed with an industr~ial development. <br /> Sander~s r•eported that he has pr•epar•ed no concept plans for~ the 25.92 <br /> acr•es as ballfields will not wor•k with that amount of acr•eage. <br />Sander•s then r~eviewed Alter•native 1 with the Council which includes <br />such facilities as 4 ballfields, centr•al building, full-sized soccer <br />field, 90 car~ par•king lot off Center~ville Road, tennis cour•ts, basketball <br />cour~ts, play ar•ea, tr•ail system, passive r•ecr•eation space, ponding area, <br />and 31 car• par•king lot off DeSoto, picnic ar~ea and shelter. Ther•e is <br />also the potential for• an additional ballfield. Acr•eage would be 33.88 <br />acres. <br />Sander•s r•eviewed Alter~native 2 which includes ~4 ballfields and basically <br />the same facilities as in Alter•native 1. Ballfields in all pr~oposals <br />ar~e 280 feet. Dual use of outfield ar•eas for soccer~ fields is pr•oposed <br />as well. <br />Sander•s r•epor~ted that the distance between ballfields is pr•oposed at <br />150 feet which he felt worked well aesthetically as well as practically. <br />Sander•s r•epor•ted that ther•e i s a simi 1 ar par•k i n Fr•i dl ey that has the <br />150 foot distance between the fields with some mounding and development <br />of the area between the fields that wor•ks well. Bleacher~s and foul <br />lines would be located within the 150 foot separ•ation. <br />LaValle felt that the distance from the par~king lot to the fields was <br />Page -3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.