Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />August 10, 1988 <br />Metro East Mr. Blesener• introduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />Dues <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-8-331 - APPROVING THE <br />Agenda PAYMENT OF METRO EAST DUES AS RECOMMENDED <br />Item No. 14a BY THE CITY C~ERK <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr•. LaValle. <br />Flyes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 337. <br />Bow & The Council reviewed the City's Discharge and Concealment Ordinance <br />Ar•r•ows as it addr•esses bows and arr•ows with Fahey indicating that the ordinance <br />i s cl ear that bows and arr•ows ar•e not fi r•ear~ms. Fahey fel t the or•di nance <br />Agenda al l owed a bow and ar•r•ow to be carr•ied, however•, a bow and ar•r~ow coul d not <br />Item No. 15a be discharged in the City. <br />Mr~. Blesener• introduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-8-332 - INSTRUCTING THE <br />CITY ATTORNEY TO REVIEW THE CITY'S DISCHARGE <br />AND CO~ICEALMENT ORDINANCE TO DETERMINE IF IT <br />IS IN CONFORMITY tdITH STATE LAW AND IS CARRYING <br />OUT THE INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL WITH REGARD <br />TO DISCHARGING OR SHOOTING OF BOblS AND ARROWS <br />WITHIN THE CITY <br />The for~egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar~ed adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 338. <br />Utility The Council discussed State Law which says that a contr~actor must be <br />Excavation pr•ovided one call ser•vice when locating utility lines befor•e excavation. <br />Agenda Blesener poi nted out that the League of Minnesota Cities is studying <br />Addition this issue and has recommended that no action be taken at t his time <br /> until their study is completed. Blesener suggested that the City Clerk <br /> moniter~ the League's pr~ogr~ess on this issue. <br />Water•i ng Bl esener• r•epor~ted that the Ci ty does not have an or•di nance i n effect <br />Ban which pr•ovides a fine to those violating the City's water~ing ban. Blesener~ <br />Ordinance suggested that a similar ordinance to the City of St. Paul's be adopted <br /> which pr•ovides a $10 fee for~ disconnectin g water• service, a$25 fine and <br />Agenda a$10 fee for r•ec onnecting water ser•vice. St. Paul's or~dinance also <br />Addition <br />Page -18- <br />