Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />August 10, 1988 <br />Recess At this point in the meeting, 8:20 P.M., Council took a short recess. <br />The meeting was reconvened at 8:25 P.M. <br />Text The Mayor opened the Public Hear•ing to consider~ adoption of an Or•dinance <br />Amendment which would allow the setback for• accessory buildings const r•ucted on <br />Or•dinance single family par•cels pr~ior• to June 25, 1980 to be r~ebuilt at their <br />No. 307 pr•ior• sideyar•d setback distance pr•ovided such setback is at least five <br /> feet. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 6 Ther•e was no one fr•om the gener•al public present wishing to comment on <br /> this text amendment. <br />Mr•. Blesener introduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-8-322 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT, ORDINANCE <br />N0. 307 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr~. LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener~, LaValle, Scalze, Fahey, Collova. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7_0, Page 328. <br />The City Planner• pointed out that if a pr•oper~ty owner~ with a house built <br />pr~ior to June 25, 1980 wishes to constr~uct a new gar•age, that gar~age would <br />have to meet a minimum setback r~equir~ement of 10 feet. The proposed <br />or•dinance only applies to gar~ages in existence befor~e June 25, 1980 which <br />need to be r•ebuilt for var~ious r•easons. <br />LaValle asked if the text amendment should include R-2 pr•oper•ty in addition <br />to R-1. <br />The Planner replied that duplexes in R-1 areas ar•e non-conforming uses. <br />The City's duplexes which ar•e located in R-2 districts ar•e r~elatively <br />new and this text amendment would pr•obably not apply in those instances. <br />Mr. Blesener~ intr~oduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: <br />ORDINANCE N0. 307 - AMENDING SECTION 905.050 <br />OF THE LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA ZONING ORDINANCE <br />REGARDING SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN R-1, <br />SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS <br />The for•egoing or~dinance was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener•, Scalze, LaValle, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />~Or•dinance declared adopted. <br />Page -6- <br />