11-23-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PIINUTES City Council November 23, 1988 Hoelscher The for•egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by P4r•. Blesener. Accessor•y Ayes (5) Scalze, Blesener•, Collova, Fahey, LaValle. Building Na,ys (0). (Cont.) Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appear•s in Resolution f3ook ~lo. 20, Page 538. p1rs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-11-504 - APPROVING THF NOELSCHER REQUEST FOR CONDITIO~IAL USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY GARAGF SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH T!iE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THF CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS NOVEMBER 7_, 19f38 REPORT The foregoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr. Collova. Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Blesener. Na,ys (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r~esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 539. Conoco Fahey opened the Public Hearing to consider~ the r~equest of Conoco for Convenience conditional use oer~mit for a convenience 9as station on the nor•theast Gas corner• of Little Canada Road and Center•ville Road. Fahey pointed out Station that the Planning Commission r•ecommended denial of the CUP due to the proposed location for the cur•b cut on Center~ville Road, which they Agenda believed to be a public hazar•d. The City Planner~ has recommended Item No. 6 approval subject to compliance with the recommendations as contained in his r•eport dated November 3, 1988. Fahe,y pointed out that a r•evised site plan has been submitted to the City Planner since the Plannin9 Commission meeting. The City Planner• r•eviewed the r~evised site plan pointing out that it now complies with his r~ecommendations for enlarging par•king stalls, loading ar•ea as r~ecommended, enclosing trash ar•ea, and moving the Centerville Road cur•b cut further to the nor•th. The Planner r•epor~ted that the Ordinance requires curb cuts to be 60 feet from an inter•section, and the curb cut as pr~oposed by Conoco is now 64 feet. Fahey asked if the County had been consulted with regard to the curb cut location on Centerville Road. Fahey repor•ted that he had concer~ns with the location of the curb cut and would like to I<now the County's position on the matter. alesener• commented that he did not agree with the point at a~hich the City Planner deter•mined the cor•ner to be. Blesener nointed out that the cur•b cut is proposed 40 to 50 feet nor•th of the actual corner• of the inter•section. Page -3-