Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />November 23, 19f38 <br />Conoco Scalze pointed. out that the City previously offered Tax Increment <br />Convenience Financing on a previous development proposal for this property if <br />Gas Station the Mondor proper~t,y were included in the pr•oposal. Scalze suggested <br />(Cont.) that this might be something the Council wishes to consider• again. <br />Scalze asked if the only major change in the site plan fr~om what was <br />pr•esented to the Planning Commission is the relocation of the Centerville <br />Road curb further north. <br />The Planner• stated that this was correct. <br />Fahey felt that the proposal should be tabled until the City Engineer <br />has an opportunity to study it as well as obtain input fr~om the County. <br />LouFlnn Drake, property owner at Centerville Road and Racine Orive, <br />stated that she was opposed to the pr•oposal agreeing with pr•evious <br />comments that there is a dangerous traffic situation on Centerville <br />Road. Qrake did not believe the curb cut as proposed would work. <br />There was no one else from the gener•al public present wishing to speak. <br />P~r•. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moued its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIOPI N0. 88-11-505 - CLOSIDI6 THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING 0~! THE CONOCO REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERP1IT TO COPJSTRUCT CONVEDIIENCE GAS <br />ST4ITION A.T THE I~ITEP.SECTION OF LITTLE CANA~A <br />ROAD AND CENTERVILLE ROAD <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconc!eci by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, LaValle, Scalze, Collova. <br />Na,ys (0). <br />Resolution declared ac!opted. <br />This r•esolution appears in Resolution Book Pdo. 20, Page 540. <br />Blesener again stated his feeling that the development proposal should <br />include the P9ondor property as well. Blesener pointed. out the situation <br />on Rice Str~eet where he felt two properties should have been required. <br />to be developed together and resulting problems that have faced the <br />Council because these two parcels were not combined. <br />Fahey felt that befor~e action is taken on the pr•oposal, input should <br />be sought from the County Engineer. <br />The Cit.y Engineer~ stated. that his fir~st reaction is that this is a <br />ver•y bad corner. liowever~, the City Engineer• stated that he would like to <br />discuss the situation with the County. The Engineer• stated that he would <br />be sur•prised if the County appr•oved the curb cut on Centerville RoaA as <br />proposed. <br />Page -6- <br />