Laserfiche WebLink
nlztao~rFs <br />City Council <br />Pebruary ?.2, 19f39 <br />Announce- t•~rs, Scalze mentioned the boolc that tkie Fia.storical Society <br />rnents is ~aorking on pertaining to the Ci of I,ittle Canada. The <br />(cont,) public is welcome to attend thea.'~° p~osn Tuesdayafternoon <br />correction E`~~~~• The boolc's editor wi11 be Garrett ~iebert, a <br />res_89-3-94 ~ormer columnist for the Dispatcki, <br />Section Fr i2rs. Scalze opened the continuation ot the pu~lic hearing on <br />PUD 11rea the Section 6 PUll area rezoning. b1rs. Scalze expJ.ainecl that <br />Rezoning tkie proposal is to rezone from Light Industrial (I-1) to <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD). <br />7lgenda <br />Item No. 5 1lccorcling to the Planner°s report, the purpose of the <br />rezoning is to obtain as high a quali9:y as practicable with <br />rigorous standards, but not so much thaf. it would ~e an <br />economic unreality, <br />tlr, Gri~tman stated that the adopt9.on of the rezoning ~aould <br />rec~uire at leas'c four votes from the Council, <br />t•1r, Collova introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoptions <br />~tESOLU`['?OIV N0~_£39 _2-69 - CLOSING ~~Cf3E P[JI3L.T.C <br />IIF'~1kiIAIG ON Tk3P CONTINUATION OF `SiIE SFCTTON 6 PUI~ <br />ARF~ RE7,ONING PROPOSIIT, <br />The foregoing resolution ~vas duly seconded by D4r, t3].esener. <br />11yes (3) F3lesener, Collova, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). <br />z:esolution declared adoptec~, <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Hook Dto. 21, Paye 71, <br />rTr. Slesener asked P7r. Grittman if tl~e standards of ~.he PUn <br />district could be designed as an T-P standarda P-7r, Grittrnan <br />sta~ed that PU1~ zoning does not have a set of performance <br />sta~zclards, and upon tall;ing with some o~ tkze property <br />ownErs, they were concerned that the City was going to hol.cl <br />to the IP standards without any variation. P9r, Cri.ttman <br />sa9.d that was not ~he event, <br />T~lrs. Scalze st~tec~ that there is a compromise between tkie <br />I-1 district and the IP district as stated in the Planner°s <br />report, Stae also stated that the Pl~nninc~ Comrnission h~d <br />recommended approva]. of tYae rezoning proposal, <br />Page 2 <br />