Laserfiche WebLink
~zznTu~rs <br />City Council <br />February 2?., 19II9 <br />Leibel P~1r, Grittman indicated that the proposed drive~aay for the <br />Final Plat Leibel Additi on should be blaclctopped, and that be~ore the <br />Approval. site plan is approved, ~hese recruirements can be looked at <br />(cont.) again, <br /> 1`Tr, IIlesener introduced the follocoing resolution and movea <br /> its adoptions <br />~Z~SOI,UTION NO_,._Fi9=?.!'76 - APPROVIIVC, THE L~Ii3PL <br />FINAI, PLAT SU}3JECT TO TFIE RECOC4P9£IVDI~TIONS OF TIIk3 <br />PLADINFR AND FINZ-1L APPROVAL F~Ok7 TFIP EDIGINE~R AND <br />TFIE 11T7'ORNFY AND G~IITIi PURTIIER RFSEARCII OPd I'.CFP~I NO< <br />3 AS I'AR 11S USIDIG DUST-k'I2EE NIATFRT.AL POR '.CIIl3 <br />PIZI VEYdAY <br /> The foregoing resolution ioas duly seconded by Airs. Scalze, <br /> Ayes (3) Scalze, Blesener, Collova, <br /> rlays (0) . <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution ~3ook No, 21, Page 7B, <br />Salak ~~r, Richard Salalt appeared before the Council requesta.ng <br />Property approval oL- his pro~osed property division. P•Zrs. Scalze <br />vivision indicated tk~a~ the Planning Commission has recommended <br /> approval cont9.ngent on the recommendations ot thE Planner. <br />Agenda <br />Item No> 11 DIr. Salak indicated tkiat he is proposing that his current <br /> lot be diva.ded into two loLS tracts a and b, 'Cract b will <br /> Y~e used for ~uture developmen~. Tract b consi.sts of 7,92 <br /> acres, <br /> r1rs. Scalze asY,ed the t~7r, Carley if there was a~uture <br /> transportation plan for that area, C4r. Carley indicated he <br /> ~,~ould k~e dascussing this matter 7.ater, <br /> Mr, glesener asked ~7r. Salak, in se~arating such a large <br /> parcel, wkaat kiis plans were for the res~ of it, <br /> Mr. Salak indicated tha~ he plans to sell the rest of ~.lze <br /> property once he c~ets his division approved. <br /> P4rs. Scalze indicated that she would lilce the Engine~r to <br />corTection review the thoroughPare plan as it pertains to the <br />res.89-3-94 development of the land,, * if the plan was still pertinant <br /> and update it if necessary. <br />PaCJe 7 <br />