My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-89 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
03-22-89 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:50:39 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:52:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3020 R~SOLUTION N0. 89-3-109 - APPROVING TH~ CONDITIONAL <br />T~ailer USE P~RMIT OF 3020 TRAILER PARK WITH THE RECOMMENDA- <br />Pa~k TION FROM THE PLANN~RS <br />(Cont) <br /> The foregoixig resolution was duly secorided by Mr. Blesener. <br /> Ayes (5) LaValle, Blesener, Collova, Fahey, Scalze . <br /> Nays (0). <br /> Reso lution declared adopted. <br /> 'Phis resolution appears in Resolution Boole No. 21, page 112. <br />FinaServe Mr. Fahey stated this matter was considered by the Planning <br />Sigri Height Commission who voted 4 to 2 to a pprove tYle sign variance <br />Variance and also recommended by a 6 to 0 vote that the Council amend <br /> and apply freeway frontage z ones to allow h igher signs and <br />Agenda different sign requirements with regard to locations such <br />Item No. 7 as the Fina Station adjacent to Itighway 36. <br />At this time the Council was presented a lengthy document <br />by Mr. Pat Wilcox, attorney for Fina Oil and Chemical Co. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced Mr. Wilcox to present the documents. <br />Mr. Wilcox state~ the documents presented to the Council <br />were to be entered into record. Ten of tYiem are copies <br />of prior City Planning reports regarding previous denial <br />of request by Fina for a 30 foot sign. Some pertain to <br />the ConnCo variance and also the Union 76 variance. Also <br />included are four to five photographs of various stations <br />being talked about; a drawing of what Pina proposes, which <br />is a blue sign of the same height but with two poles rather <br />than foury and a copy of the current sign. There is also <br />a copy of the Warranty Deed (Exhibit 10) whereby Mobi1 Oi1 <br />conveys tYie Union 76 station at Little Canada Road and 35L <br />to Mobil Oil. TYiere is also an Affidavit from Suburban <br />Lighting (#13) explaining the structural modifications to <br />the former Mobi1 Station once it became Union 76. <br />Exhibit 18 was not presented to the Planning Commission. <br />It shows the number of pylon signs in the City which exceed <br />the specified height. It shows 12 to 14 signs over the <br />specified height. He apologized the heights were not <br />completely accurate but their best estimates. <br />One additional item Mr. Wilcox called to the Council's <br />attention is from a previous letter to tPie Planning Commissiori <br />dated February 28 where he erroneously stated the taller <br />of the pylon signs over the Union 76 station is 62 feet. <br />His error, it is 50 feet. This was called to the Planning <br />Commission's attention and he also wanted the Council to <br />know. <br />Mr. Blesener asked how many signs were erected since the <br />sign ordinance went into effect. <br />Mr. Wilcox could not te11 for a fact but ConnCo sign subject <br />to the 1987 "ConnCo Variance" and the Union 76 sign. <br />Page -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.