Laserfiche WebLink
KVBM property is subject to state deed restriction. The tower <br />ielevision attorney stated the State would noi approve the site for <br />(Cont) the transmission tower. Little Canada would have to <br />purchase the land and that would delay the plans six months. <br />They are now looking at other sites, including Roseville, <br />keeping their options open. Tauled until further contact <br />with us. <br />Mr. Collova stated the proposed tower is about the same <br />height as the Shoreview tower but designed different so <br />can be built on smaller property. <br />Mr. Fakiey stated Little Canada would get a use fee of <br />$50,000, $75,000 to $100,000 per year going into the City <br />generating more money to the cii.y than a buildirig on an <br />equivalent piece of property. <br />Byron Kucher, 303 E. Brooks I~ve., statecl his otie major <br />concern was that it would be located betweexi major trans- <br />mission towers and ihe majority of Little Canada. What <br />would be the effect on TV and will everyone have to kiook <br />up to cable and all tvs witPiin their home in order to get <br />good reception. <br />Mr. Blesener stated that theoretically they shoul~l not be <br />aifected but agrees a concern. This will have to be looked <br />into further if the tower becomes a reality. <br />Mr. Kucher stated another concern is the liabilicy to the <br />city. <br />Mr. Blesener stated this is another area having to be worked <br />out. <br />Nlr. Kuchei stated that basically he is not in favor of the <br />tower being located in Little Canada. He feels it won't <br />enYiance liittle Canada, is risky and would change i:he skyline. <br />Mr. Fahey suggested we get some outside advice, especially <br />concerned about impact of developers building in area and <br />having to look at the tower. <br />Mr. Grittman will research before next meeting. He will <br />also call Washington to get opinion. <br />Mondor/ Mr. Fahey introducecl the Mondor/bScNar,lara Property PUD <br />McNamara Continuaiion of Hearing. There is a motion from the Planning <br />Property Cornmission to authorize the PUD rezoning for the McNamara <br />PUD and Mondor properties. Council does have VETO power. <br />Continuation <br />Mr. McNamara appeared on his own behalf. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 10 Mi. McNamara stated the Planning Commission gave some <br />recommesidations to contact Mondors to discourage PUD. f3e <br />(McNamara) wants to purchase the property. Conoco wants <br />Page -9- <br />