Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-24-89 Council MinutesP7INUTLS 0~' ':I."F3F RPGULA.R C~IE;PTSNG CITY COUDICIL LTTT7;I; CAN~D~P ~[INNPSOTA Ilay 2~, 193`~ i~ursuant to due ca11 and notice tizereof a regular mee~ing of tiie Council of_ the City o~ Little Canada, I~iinnesota ~vas kield on tYie 24stPi day of f~7ay, 19t39 in the Council CliamUers oL the Ci~.y Center loca~ed at 515 Little Canacla ].2oa d in said City. Ac~enda A2ayor ~iichael L'ahey clzaired the meeting and called it to Item No. 1 order at 7a30 p>m. T''tie to1'lowing members oi tYae Council ~~ere present at roll ca11s ~lgenda C'fEM}3ER5 Pk2E;SS^.NT: P-7ayor P~Tr, C~4ichael Fahey ' I'cern No, 2. Council~aoman t•1rs . T3everly Scalz~~ Councilman T4r, I;ill }3lesener Counci7.man t~1r, I2ick Collova Councilrnan t4r. Jim LaValle ALSO PP.1'sS:~N~i': City Cler'r, Consultincl Fnc~ineer City 1lttorney Ca.ty Planner Recording Secretary P-1r, JosePh Chlebeck P4r. Donald Carley T-7r, Thomas Sweeney i~Ir. stEVe Gri~ttman IZrs, Pec~c~y Jenscii `:Che mernber> of' ~he. Council rna~;irig cxie reso].utiona zire not oi~ record, flinuLes A correction was rnade to the iourth paragra}~ki oi the npri.l 26, 1G3II9 m9.nutes, TYae word "clisplace" should 'ue Ac~enda replaced with the word "storaye", Ttern No, 3 ado~tion: 9.ntroducecl the following resolution ana moved i.ts .~SOLiJT~.C~N NO H9-5-~06 - APPROVIV~ TFIE P~9INiJTES OF THF APRTL 26, 19£39 R1.CtJZAR COUNCIL A1F~`.C2~1G t~S AP4ENDED Tkie ioregoing resolutaon ~vas duly secondecl by _~__~, Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Ea;iey, LaValle, Scalze. N1ys (0). Resolution declared aclopted, __ introduced the follo~aing resolution and moved i~.s adoptione RL,>OLUTION NOs_ &9~5~2.07 - APPROVING THE P7S~tUTFS OP TEIP MAl' 30 19f39 SPECTAL t•1EETTNG 11S 5C113D7ITT~D TYie a`oregoing resolution was duly seconcled by ~ Ayes (5) Plesener, Collova, Pahey, LaVa11e, Scalze, Naps (0). Resolution declared ac~opted. Pflinutes City Council ~~Iay 2~, 19II9 t7inutes 11 correction ~•~as made ~o ~he ~1ay 10, 19II9 minutes. The (cont,) minut~s had indicated that I~Ir. LaValle was present ~vkien he had been absent> adoptions introduced ~he follocaing resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO £3~-5-20(3 - 11PPI20VING TE3E P9I~TUTES OF `~'I3F P+I71Y l00 1959 REGULAR COITNCIL I9EP`CING AS fiP~lE~IDED The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by _ __! _ nyes (5) I3lesener, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Scalze, Nays (0). Resolutaon declared adopted. I3ardee's t~r. E'ahey indicated that tiardee's is seeking a conditional CUP use permit for permission to constr.uct a Hardee's Family Restaurant at 3354 Rice Street in Little Canada, I9r, Fak~ey Agenda stated that the Planning Commission has recommendec~ approval Item No. 5 of this request subject to a nurnber o~ conditions as found in the Planner°s report dated P9ay 3, 19II9. r•~rs. Scalze asked P4r. Grittman to de~ine the meaning oi "yiving consideration to the consoli.dation of two exits", P~Ir. Grittman stated that two of the exits on the original sketch shoulcl be consoliclated, P~Ir, Grittman in~ica~ed tk~at ~kae purpose was to limit access to Rice Street, A revisecl site plan tor the proposed Ilardce's was skiocan ~o the Council, C9rs. Scalze noted that they kiad moved tlae L-rash receptical to a better location. The revised site plan also showed that the drive tlirough aisle had been moved sS.xty feet to the north so that it e~as in accordance ~~~9.th the City Codes. ~dditionally, the parking lot was changed to aid in the circulation of traffic. The drive ~hrough aisle ~vas to be an ec~ress only exit and such was not indicated on the plat, It skaould be shotan as an exit only. There was another driveway chanye oft of tkie Country nriv~ exit to aid in circulation> Bzrs. Scalze asked about a loading area, because there ~aas no~ one indicated on the revised site plan, Page -2- r~inutes City Council P9ay ?~, 1989 Ilardee's Discussion follo~aed as to whether tflr, Carley had previously CUP recomrnended that a speci~ic driveway was to be a right turn (cont,) only, The reason that I~1r. Carley stressed this point ~•aas that i.E anyorie wanted to turn south on Rice S~reet, they ~eould have difLiculty r~ecause it is too close to the intersection, t~ir. Fahey asked iL the plans submittced ceere preliminary or final. It was indicated that whether the plans were final or not ~oas up to the Council, The represen~atives £rom IIardee's felt that the plans could be approved contingent upon movement of the driveway to a certain locationa r9r, Grittman hact the same recommendation as P~1r. Carley with regards to the drive~oay on~o Rice Street as shown on pag~ 9 of the Planner's report. r~1r, Maroney, a representative from Yaggy Colby A~sociates, appeared before the Council stating that he thought the original plan ~vas ~or a consolida~ion o~ access, that ~ve hac! two accesa points o~f of Rice S~.ree~. that was in and out trafPic. t~1r. l~7aroney indicated that the plan was revised to do two things; to move the rnain access further north to allow greater distance bet~aeen the Rice Street/Country Drive intersection and ~the new proposed Ilardee's entrance and to change the north access to an exit only, These changes were made to improve the circulation plan hoping it would mee~. tkie requirements as stated, PZr. Carley indacated that an island may hav~ to be placed at the c~rive through exit to force the traffic to ~urn right, P~7r. Carley stated that right turn exit was not obvious from looking at the pl.at drawing. P4r. Carley suggested a curb si.milar to the one at the other Hardee's site in Little Canada. Mr. Fahey confirmed that the people exiting who may saant fio turn lef~ on 12ice Street would liave to drive out o£ the rnain c~riveway. The representative from Hardee's said that they u~ere prepared to meet the ac~ditional conditions that ~oere raised at the Planning Commi~sion meeting, Their intent woulcl be to submit a£inal sa.te plan with all of the necessary requirernents that u~ere requested by the Planning Commission. Page -3- ~Iinutes City Council May 2~, 7.9II9 Hardee's introduced the Eollowing resolution and moved i~s CUP adoptions (cont,) R~SOLUTION~_0 £39-5-209 ° CLOSING TIiP PUSLTC IIEARING ON THE ITFIRDF£' S CONDITIONIIL USE PERIv17T The foregoing resolution ~oas duly seconded by ~ Ayes (5) k3lesener, Collova, £ahey, LaValle, Scalzeo Nays (0), Resolution cieclared adopted. A Councilman asked about the loading dock that was not shovm on the plan, The Council was assured tkalt it would be shoFm on the tinal plan. introduced the following resolut9on and moved its aao~czone RESOIiUT~ON_DIO._ f39=5~2~ - APPROVING TFIE CONDITIO~AL USF PERP~ITT FOR TFT~ PROPOSED HARDEE°S SITE PURSUAIVT TO TFIF R~COA'1P-1EIVDA'1'7.ONS OF' THE CITX PL~DtN~R ADID TIIE PLANDtI1VG COP~IP/fIaSION The Loregoing resolution was duly seconded by _ ___~, ~yes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, Lavalle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted, The Itardee°s representative was asked if he would concluc~e ttiat of a friendly amendrnent with the requirement that the north access be a rigkit turn only. The Hardee's representative accepted this requirement. Text The proposed text amendment is relating to the height of ~~mendm~nt ~reestanding signs near limited access freewaysm A number Signs of cities were called and no one seems to be lilce anyone else, The Ordinance the City Council a.s considering is like ngenda Vadnais Heights and it is readable enough to enforce i~. Item No. 6 t9r, E3lesener asked abou'c the section i.n the proposed text amendmen~ that read "on parcels which serve a common property line,,,.,the maximum sign kieight skzall be allowed to be 30 feet". t•4r, Eilesener stated that the Code says that all free s~andiny signs sha11 conform to the following provisions. Mr. Blesener indicated that on the table oi permi~ted sign areas and hea.ghts, he did not see anything that precludes that you can bypass the square footage and get the height, Page -9- Minutes City Council h9ay 7a, 19II9 Text Amendment Sign~ (cont.) PYr. Grittrnan agreed saying that it was not their intention to change the square footage requirement, just to allow taller signs> Mr. Blesener stated that he felt it does not address wkaat the City expected it to with regard to the Fina sign. P1r. Fakaey ayreed that it did not preclude the square footage. P2r. Blesener felt tkiat a section should be added cahich reads "on parcels which serve a common property line with limited access fireeways, the maximum sign height shall be 30 feet regardless of building size", P•irs. Sc~lze asked i~ ~hey want to malce it so with the additional setback you can go up to 35 feet. h1r. Grittman said that the 30 Eeet under the new ordinance is an addi~ional five feet over any maximum sign t,~ith no extra setback ancl i.~ is the intent to say ~hat ~he additional setback is the desirable characteristic and that the buildings that are 2,500 square feet in size should be able to take advantage of the additional setbac)c provision. [Zr. Grittman gave the exarnple of ~he ['ina Station adjacent to the freeu~ay. It could have a szgn that is 30 feet. 49r. Grittman said that the reason for the setback provision is because oi a 2,500 square foot building right next door to Fina could also have a 30 foot sign if they set it bacic far enough. The setbacic provision should be consistent in the regulations. Mr. ~3lesener stated that he reads the ordinance as saying that you can go to 30 Leet or you can go to 35 reet, but you will have to have ~he sc~uare footage to ge~ there, P7r, Fahey suggested making the additional o~ords aiter the Eirst two sentences "regardless oi building size". I~1rs, Scalze asked if anyone on the staf:C de~ermined ii 600 is going to be a problem. ~~r. F3lesener indicated that ~ehen you go 600 feet from the center of the road, you really are not going tkiat far, P~lr. Grittman stated that you really are e~tending probably 400 to 500 feet frorn the center of the Ereeway, dependiny upon the freecaay wi~h the interchange. ATr. Grittman indicated that tkiey looY.ed at tY~at by taiciny out section maps and checleed each intersection area and they did noL extend beyond a one block lengtki in any intersection. Page -5- P•linutes City Council May 2~, 198~ ~L'C' Y `L Amendrnent Signs (cont,) introduced the following resolution and moved its aaoption: R~SOLUTION NO ~9-5-211 - CI~O:iING TEI~ PUI3T,IC IIF;ARSNG ON THF TEXT F1TflFNDt•'IED7T CONCFRNING FRFBSTANDING SIGNS Tkie foregoing resolution was duly s~conded Uy ___~ Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, E~'ahey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. introduced tkae sollowing resolution and moved its adopti.on: P.PSOLUTION~O 89_5T212 - ADOPTING 01:DTNANC~ NO. 315 AS PRL''uPNTED }3Y TF3E PI~E~NN£R ti4ITFT TEIE ADDTTTON OF TF3F WORDS "IiEG~RDLESS OI' TIII; BUIS.DTNG SIZE" [~T THE BP1D OP TIIF FIRST AIVD SP^,COND SENTENCES OF TII~ P~20POSED ORDTNANCE VdITH THE TN~CENTTON I3EING TI3AT b9E ALL06d A 30 POOT STGN I2EGAF2DLESS OF TI3E BUTLDTNG SIZE ALOD7G £REEWAX ACCESS I2011DS OR 4~lITTiIN 600 F~~T OF ~CHE INTERSk,CTTON 64ITI1 LT69IT~D ACCESS TO TIIF' FRI^~EbV[1Y '.i'he foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Ayes (3) Collova, rahey, LaValle, Dtays (2) F3lesener, Scalze. Pesolution failed, P~r, F3lesener indicated that after much thought and aiter readinc~ ttxe Planner°s report, he ~•rould be F~illing ~o cliange the 30 to 25 feet urhich give nine feet additional onto the Fina sign plus one for eack~ setback foot or ~ehatever that is. PIr, LaValle stated that the problern is that these features were two that were discussea, PIr. Grittman stated that it was about a particular sign that is clearly in excess of tlie City°s sign requirements and that he thought tliat c•~ha~ he said is if you go around in any comrnunity, you ~aill find signs that are far in excess ot tkze siyn ordinances Lor one or t~ao reasons, There v~as either a variance to that sign or the sa.gn was issued prior to the current thing on it, Little Canada has a number oi those tha'c have been brought up. This is the shortcoming of worlciny arouncl everyone's ordinanees. It is not going to tell you ~vhat everyone's sign 19.mits are at if you are using everyone's ordinances as a gauge if your's is reasonable or not, Page -6- N19.nutes City Council P4ay 2~, 19II9 Text pir. Blesener suggested that they start with what t1r, Amendment Grittman has put c(o~m; t~laplesaood with 25 Peet; Roseville Signs Wl~.I1 25 feetp 6Vhite F3ear Lake is lE feet; Vadnais IIeights is (cont.) ?0. If the City went with 25, it ~vould be allocaing the maximum tkiat any o£ the neighboriny cities have. ~1r. LaValle felt that this Gaas not truE because tiiere are signs in ~~laplewood and b4hi~e Bear that exceed the 25 feet, P~r, BJ.esener acknowledged tkzis; liowever, felt that tYxe Council was talking about today°s orc~i.nances. ~4r. F3lesener fel~ that those other cities have also changed their ordinances, P1r, E`ahey felt that 30 feet ~•~as too low and felt there had been enough discussion on the issuem ~~1rs. Scalze stated that ~Ir. Grittman coulcl check into the rest oi the rnetro area if ti~at is what the Council wantU him to do, t~ir. E~'ahey Eelt that the arnendment sliould have been what is allosved for a building regardless of size, which is within 600 teet oi the freeway, and the report he was referring to did not address tYiis, t~irs. Scalze replied that it did address the Pina sign request, Mr. Grittman stated that he dad loolc into what cities ar~ doing with regard to the sign height that they a11ow witkain or aajacen~ to £reeways, t-ir, Grittman indicated that sign heights that are allowed to be next to free~aays vary in commercial districts anysahere from 11 feet to 95 feet within Arden Fii11s, I3loomington, ~3urnsville, Eclen Prairie, Fridley, C-laplewood, Plymouth, Roseville, White Pear and tvoodbury, Page -7- P9inutes City Council Alay 2~, 1969 Text ~lmendment Signs (cont.) Prattalonc CUP Agenda Itern No. 7 its adoptiono introduced the Lo11o~~iny resolution and moved RESOLUTION IVO~ f39-5~213 - ADOPTING OI2DIN~c1C3.s' NO. 315 AS PRES~NTED GY THE PLI~NNER ZVITH TFIE ADAITION OF TfSE GVORDS "REGIIRDLESS OE' TfIE I3UILDING SIZG" STATFD 11FTEP. BOTH REASONING "TO }3E 30 FEP`C"/ aTRIICING TI3E SENTENCE ABOVf~ ADDITION7IL EIBIG'rI`1' GdITII TIIE LAST SPNTENCE REAllING "SIGN AREA SEIALL P~ AS ALLOVIED BY TIl~ T11I3LE° ~ STR2TtING TFIE ADDITTONIaL SETF3ACF: ALLO6dANCFS AND TEiE WORDS "1aBOVE" ANn "~DDITION~IL I3~IGf1TS" a AND F1D~ING TIIF GJORDS "SSCTION 903.110,E.5.C,(~) DOCS NOT APPLY WITFI TFISS ORDINANCF OR SECTION" The foregoing resolution svas duly seconded by ~~T_ 11yes (~) Collova, Blesener, E~'ahey, LaValle. Nays (1) Scalzc, Resolution declared adopted. Mr. Fakiey stated that i,he Frattalone conditional use permit has been resch~duled ior the June 2H, 19II9 rneetiny. Nir, Blesener askcd why somebody was in the builda.nc~ already ~vithout a permit, ~Zr. Grittman said that he did not lcnow why someone ~~~as in there. ~7r, Grittman stated that he had asked the landscaper about it. The landscaper indicated that kie was not aware o~ the car dealer, nir. IIlesener told the Council that it saas a wholesaler out ot Ryan Industrial Parl:. P4r. Blesener explained further tkiat he had stopped there on a Saturday after getting a call. The car dealer indicated that he had gotten the impression after talking to the City Clerk and Planner that there would be no problem with the approval of a conditional use permit. P9r, t3lesener felt that the car dealer ~aas not told that he could not move into the building until he received a conditional use permit. Mr. Grittman i.ndicated that he had told the car dealer precisely that the site was not eligible £or that kind of use because os the existence of Tom's Auto Sales. P4rs. Scalze stated tha~ there was a distance regulation in Li~tle Canada's Code, The Council had passed it a year ago so that there would not be a line up of used car dealers. Page -S- hiinutes City Council P1ay 24, 19II9 Frattalone C9r, Grittman explained ~hat the car dealer applied for a CUP conda.tional use permit at City F3a11. PQr, Grittman stated (cont.) that he tried to get ahold of Frank Frattalone to tell him that the business would not be allowed at that site. Mr. Grittman said that D9r. Frattalone never returned his call. ~flr. Chlebeck stated that the applicant was requesting to be heard, Mr. I'ahey indicated that he did not feel ~he request would be passed. n9rs. Scalze thought the applicant should be told tha t his request ~•~as against Little Canada's Codes, 1~9r. Fahey asked P4r. Chlebeclc to intorm P9r. Frattalone that his request would probably not be approved, flo~ae/DeBace Mr. Fahey indicated that the Howe/Dei3ace subdivision request Subdivision was in connection with the Fiardee's proposal, The Plannirig Com mission recommended approval of the subdivision request. ~genda The proposal i~ to split a remnant of property that was part Tt~m No. II of the o1d Dick and Mary's property south of Country Drave on ~tice Street. ~1 gentlernan from the audience indicated that for some reason the Court House hac~ combined two parcels of land which belonged to the same owner. P+Ir. ~iowe and Pflr. DeBace are no~a asking for the lots to be split as they ~aere originally, I~irs. Scalze indicated that since the property in question is just a 1,700 square ioot piece, she feels that the park charge should be waived. t+7rs. Scalze stated that previously the Parlc Commission had recommended tax reformation, but did not have any minutes regarding the proposal; therefore, they were not sure exactly c,~kzat to recommend, Mrs. Scalze felt that in this case unc7er the circumstances, the Park Comrnission would not have recommended tax reformation. The City Planner and ~he Planning Commission have recommended approval. Page -9- f~linutes City Council N1ay 24, 19II9 IIowe/DeSace _ introduced the following resolution and moved Subdivision its adoption: (cont.) 12ESOLUTION NO, 89-5^214 - APPROVTNG THE HOT~7E/DEIIACE SUBDTVTSION RLQUEST AND 6VATVING TEi~ PARK CIIIIRG~ AS RECOMP~4ENDED SY TI3P PARR COMNIISSTON The foregoing resolution was duly second~d by ~,_~_ Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Scalze, Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Stellick P1r, Fahey indicated that ~he blarket Place has requested Property approval of a lot split to resolve some issue that was Division regarding mortgage financing, P9r. Fahey stated that tk~e parcel they were talking about splitting is located at the Agenda east end of the existing t4arket Place building adjacent to Item No. 9 Garden Terrace Apartments, The Planning Commission has recommended approval unanimously. ~4r. Grittman has recommended platting of the Market Place and designating tki~ lot that is split off as an outlot until final platting. t9r. Stellicic asked if there would be a parlc charge. Mrs, Scalze stated that the staff would look into this. P9r. Stellick stated that at one time it used to be a separate tax parcel, when the site was sold for housing, apparently this was merged with the rest of the land for tax purposes, f9r. Stellick indicated that originally it was separate tax parcels that were later merged through the action of the housing, t9r. Fahey asked if the parcel they wish to divide is off of Garden Terrace's parcel and not ofP the ~~iarket Place parcel. P~1r. Stellick indicated that the parcel was a separate h.ax parcel and then somehow what remained oL that parcel got merged with the Market Place parcel. P1r. Fahey felt that it was done intentionally by someone who filed a legal document. ~~Irs. Scalze asked if the r~larket P1ace wanted to sell the parcel of land. P~ir. Stellick said that they didn'~ want to sellp however, they wanted it there for finance so if they ever want ~o develop anything on it, they would have the freedom to clo so. Nlrs. Scalze felt that the City may need a legal opinionm Page -10- ~4inutes City Council f4ay 2~ P 19II9 Stellick Mr, Fahey f•elt that the Council should refer the matter to Property the City Attorney and/or Park Comm9.ssion for a determination Division as to cahether a park charge is applicable. Mrse Scalze (cont.) indicated that the Park Commission is only a recommending policy setting body. [~irs. Scalze did not Icnoso if the Commission could legally research the ordinance to determine if the parls charge is applicable, Mr. Fahey asked r~r, Sweeney what his opinion 4~as on the matter. Mr. Scaeeney indicated that he had no opinion at that time. Mr, I~lesener asked if the parlc charye could have previously been charged be£ore when it was subdividecl, Mr, Chlebeck stated tha~ he did not recall, P4r, Chlebeck asked P4r. Stellick when it had been subdivided before. Mr, StellicY, presumed it was around 1976 or 1977, Mr. Fahey indicated that the Council should approve the lot split subject to the cletermination by the City Attorney as to whether the park charge is applicable and if so, Mr. Stellick would have to pay the appropriate park charge per ordinance, r~ir. Fahey felt tha~ this situation ~~as clearly different from the Howe/DeBace situation, but felt that ~1r. Stellick could ~vork ~aith Nlr. Sweeney on the matter. b4r. Fahey stated tha~ i~ T4r. Sweeney felt that it was a matter that the Council should consider further, the Council Wiii talce it up again, P4r, LaValle asked ho~a close to the building the property line would be, P~lr. LaValle was told that the property line would be right adjacent to the building, r1r. LaValle commented that a roadway for police and fire trucks may not be around the building. hZr. Stellick indicated that there would be a roadway. Mr. Stellick stated that when they sold the site for the housing, the site Icept growing so this boundry line here moved yet the price did not change. birs. Scalze asked if the southerly property line was adjacent to Garden Terrace's property, 1~9rs, Scalze ~•ras told that it was Garden Terrace's property line. Mrs. Scalze o~anted it clarified. ~ahen Mr, Stellick is talking about adjacent property, is he sayiny an Terrace's property, [-1rs. Scalze asked that having an easement across easement across Garden Page -11- C4inutes City Council P4ay 24 0 1989 Stellick Pdr. Stellick indicated that this was correct and that it was Property discussed at the Council meeting four or five years ago. Division Mrs. Scalze suggested that an easement being over Garden (cont.) Terrace's property should be researched for she did not recall any, r1r. Fahey felt that if the Council approved the subdivision, anyone that wants to develop the property would have to comply with existing City codes which could include the placement of an appropriate road for fire service, or at least access on the piece of property that is there, P~1r. Grittman stated that the lo~ does not have any street frontage. Mr, Grittman felt that if they were going to expand Garden Terrace or if they ~aere going to expand the P~larket Place, that would be an amendment to their existing claims to develop. City action would be required for that. Nlr. Grit~man indicated that the problem that the Council has and the reason they are suggesting a plat is ~vithout any street frontage, if the parcel were to become a separate 1ot, they could sell it to someone else even though they have no intention of doing that now. Someone else could say that they were meeting all of their setbacks and that they want to build a building there with no access and no opportunity for the senior revie~a or asic L•or further easements, or any~hinq lilce that, because they would not be subdividing at that time. They ~vould be building on an individual lot. Mr. Gri~tman indicated that it was the Council's intention to plat the property that already has a two page legal description and malce it an outlot so that C•~ro Stellick could do no development on it until it w~s Eurther platted or center expansion comes in or to provide access to the rear or side or wherever that access 4~as to go. Mr. Grittman indicated that he wanted to preclude any development on the parcel until the City knew where the access was to go. T~9r. Pahey stated that if the Council makes it an outlot, the public will krzow that it is not buildable, Mr, Grittman agreed, P~]r. Fahey asked i9r. Stellick if this was acceptable to him. ri1r, Stellick felt that it was; however, ~vanted to know if they provide cross-easement pariting to the 1ot, would it solve the ~ublic access issue. Page °12- r~inutes City Council Ptay 2~~, 1~39 >tellick t1r, Grii:tman stated tkiat tYiis is sornethisag tYaat coula be Prop~rty done to allow eascrnent parlcinc~ E rom ~he existin g parking Division 1ot, ilr. Gra. ttraan Lelt that i'r. ~aould not be a problem once (cont.) f1r. Stellick came to develop it, whether it is goinc~ to stand on its own or i~. is goirig to be an expans ion o"i' tlie Tlarket ~~1ace ttlen. P1r, F'al~ey s~ated that the Flarket P1ace is on a~~rivate ro~c~ there. T11e ~'lar{cet Place is not on a publir, acoess; ~lier~iore, ii tlxe Council ap~~roves ~he split on a private roacl, someone may tt~ink tlaat tkaey may sirn~ly come in and builc~ on it and get a permiL-, introduced tYae i:ollosv9ng resolution and rnoved its adoptione RPSOLU`PIOnT P10~_ II9-5-?,15 - 21PPROVING ~~'IIE STELLICR LOT SP. T,ZT SUuJEC'.C `.PQ TIIL PLCOMA4END[~TIONS CONT~It~d~D IN 1 FIr PL11NN13I2' ; P.PPOP'P 0}' t~1~Y 8~ 7.9u9 o SI7k3JIsC`.I' `1'q n DFTLRP~17Nk1~'IO~T OF '.~I3E CI~PY ATTORN~X CONCERNTNG G~7I3Is"SfIPR A PARF: CTI[~RGF JS 11PPLICIIBL,`.;~ 11I~7D SUT3JECT TO P~1Xi~7PNT OF ANY Si7CI3 PAI2K CrI11RGE U'X TEIP APPLIC71I~7'P IF Dl;~l'I3.P,MTNliD TII21T 011F IS DCJ13 '~iie foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ____ ~yes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, LaVallep Scalze. Nays (0)a Resolution declared ac~opteda P'Ir. }3lesener suggested that ~kie City Cleric research the paris ciaarge ~o see it it was a?reviously paid, P~lr. lilesener statecl tha~ i::~e Cit~ C1arl; shoulc~ clzecls to see kio~a i~ was cornbined. P4r. k3lesener felt that i£ Ramsey Courity combinc~l at agaizl xor convenience, the par}; charye may noi~ be ap~~ropr:iat~ again> Organized T.1rs. Kattzy Ti~~1er, a representative zrorn tYie Solid t4aste Collection 11c~visory Cornrnittee, appeared before ttie Council ~o qive an upda~e on orc~anized collection, T~rs. Tipler indicate~f that Ayenda slie and t9r, Collova have been meeting witkz the kzaulers to tldcla.tion try to ~aorl; out a contract on orc~anize~l collection as tlie Council izad r~c~uested> Page -13- ilinutes City Counci'1 P-1.ay 2a, 19£3J Organized Firs, Tipler stated that the Commi~tee has rura into a ie~a Collection problerns. Su~er Cycle, the firrn tkia~ curren'cly picks uk> (cont.) Little Canlcla'u recycl~zbles, ~aent ou~ oi business and i~acl s~nt the City a letter cancelling tl~eir contraci: as of June 1, 19E39. Tne County iias been unablE to maintaiti ~he iaci'19.tiesy thereLore, the City must come up with an alternative solution, [•7rs, Tipler indicated tkaat a cornpany by tkae narne o,°_ k21'sC0i1P lzas agreecl 'co buy the recyclables ii tlzey can r~e assured tziat enougki citi.es ~•~ill contract witki them for piclcup. iIrs. Tipler stated thaL t;I~COt7P caould like a tkar.ee-year contract with ti~e City. i-1rs. Tipler felt ~hat since tk~e City is in tne middle oc negotiations with the ixaulers on oryanized collcction, ~he City should not siyri a three-year contract. [9rs. Tipler stated ~hat tl~e otlier problern S:he Committee ~oi11 kiav~ to deal with is r,vith Poor Ra.claard's. t-1rs, Tip1Er indica'cec~ that the County }3oarcd l~as revoked Poor .P,ickzard's li.censc, iirs. Ti~~ler said that tile City has been negotiati.ng a~i.tti iive haulars; i:hree of wkaicai are major kiaulers in the City. No~~ tnat Poor Rickaard°s license has be~n revokec~, the City will only bc dealing ~~~itla t~ao rnain haulers, I+lrs. Tipler stated that there is a rnoratoriwil in exfict on :Licensing haulers so the rest oi the Caty cannot ctaoose anyone but ~;I?I anc~ 13e11aire. P-7rs. Tipler asked i:or direction xrom the Councila t'1rs. Tipler caas asltec~ if ti~~ existinc~ kiaulers u~ere Gvilling to ~ick u~ tYie recyclables as part of the new contract. tJ1rs, '1'ipler indica~ed tixzt they are tvilla.ng, but rnay be unable ~o pick u~ recyclables in the w~kaole Citya G9r. Collova ~elt that che City sllould stay with its original plan of organired collection, Sue Stanel; of t~ellaire indacated L-hat her cornpany s~~ould pa.clc u~~ recyclables ior ats customers, firs. Scalze asked ii TIS, Stanel; meant her current cus~ornersa f~7a. Starie~~ indicatec~ Y:haL she meant the customers iri tlie sectio» oL the City tixat i~er com,t>arzy would be assic~ned, I-Trs, Scalze asked ~rkzat tiie companies wou"ld chargc tk~e customers, flr. Collova indicated that this was a problem, because t~xey c~o not 'r,now to where tlley woulc~ kiave to l~au]. ttie recyclanles. Page °].4- P=linutes Ci~y Council t4~y 24~, 19~3~ Orc~aniaed [~ir, F3lesener intormecl the Council that RECOiIP ~aants to buy Co11ec~.ion out Super Cyc1e and talce over where Super Cyc1e leit of:E, (conc,) p7r. Pahey ~skec~ no~,o tkie City taould p1y lssuming that it went caith RECOPIP. tirs. Tipler stated that until the end ot the year, the County has assured ~l~e City that they will picli up 1000 oi ~he costs unless it i~ over a certain arnoun~, t~ut ~t the ena of ~.kie year, the Ci~y woul~i have to have a contract in place, I•irs. ~C'iplcr suggested tki~t the City have Sellaire and T;FI begin June 1, 1939 and ~~ay tlZern ~aith the City's c~rant rnoxiey, Lhen tize City ~~~oulcl tiave timc to t~iorlc on tkae contracc. t~Ir. 131esener asl:ed ~~~kio ~aoulcl do tlle bilJ.ing oa: tl~e organazecl collection. P-1rs. '7'ipler indicatec~ L-kaat tl~e haulers ~=~ould do thc uillii~g; ho~~~ever, if someone refused to pay their L-raslz bill, ~he City ~~~ould put it on the resident°s utility bill or rahatever the City chose to do. P4r. Plesener asked how the racycling cY~arge ~vould i~e ~~aid ~or. P4r. Collova stated that the County woulc~ ~>ay ior that until the end of the year. IIr, Fahey asic~d Yiow it saould be paid ior a~ter ~hat, T,Irs. Tipler indicated that it svoulcl appear on the residents° rcyular trash k>i11, Mrs, Scalze felt tl~at the Citp should Yiave i~ellaire ancl PFT begin collection of recyclables. iirs, Tipler indicateci tt~at these kiaulers would be picking up ~ne recyclables se~oarate frorn ti~e garb~ge. P7rN. Scalze asked if tl~e hauler:; would be willing to pic4t up for the same arnount of money i.kae Ci~y ~aould be getting irom P.amsey County under the grant. Y1rs. 7.'ipler indicated t?~at she ~aas not sure, but she ielt ~hat the haulers ~vould kaave a iair price tor the City. P.]r. S.lesener askec~ iL the two maa.n hau'lers are capable o!: picka.ng up the additional customers that the City now has, t~ts. Stanek 9.ndicated that ~hey coulct. I~1rs, Tipler ~sl.ed ii t-here were any 1ega1 problems ~,~i~ki tl~e proposal. P~1r, F'aliey inc~ica~ed ti~at there oras not, C9r, Fahey as'r,ed if a~ortion of thE City would be divide~l bet~~een the t~~~o smaller haulers, ~-irs. 'Pipler indicated i.tiat it would, [1r, I3lesener askc~cl ii tkie City ~aoulc{ laave to return Poor Ridharc~°s customers to tl7em a£ter a year, CYrs. Tipler inclicated ~hat they were not suspended but revolced. ]?age -15- IIinutes CiLy Council t~9ay 7.4, ].989 prgani~ecl __ introduced the iollo~~ing resolution anc1 moveci Collection its adoptione (cont,) RPSOLC7TTON N0~ L9-5-216 - T~MPORARILY REQU&S'PING `Pf~1~ EXISTTNG fIl1UL~RS IN 'Z'IiE CT2'Y `PO PICKUP SINGLE FF~PITLY I2I~;SiDEi~lTt~'1L ktT3f't7SL~ F1ND PFCYCLAk;T~PS The £oreyoing resolution raas duly seconc~ea by ______ Ayes (5) Slesener., Collova, Paliey, LaV~~ii~, Scalze, Nays (0). Reso].uta.on ~lcclareil adopted, t1rs. Tipler indicated that tkie multip'le tamily unii:s woula need service also, C~1rs, Tipler :[elt tk1aL- ~ilese units should be ~ut out for bid, its adopta.on: introc7uced tlae Lollowing resolution and rnoved ItF:,SOI~UTION NO~_ £3H_,5=217 - CALLING POR I32DS TO B}3 TATC~N L'Ok2 F2FCYCLING PICI~i7P POR bIUL'.C'IPT~E E'AMILY UNITS The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ____~____~_, ~1yes (5) F3lesener, Collova, Fak~ey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Pesolution declared adopted, PIr. Fahey asked if P4rs, Tipler was sti7.l negoti.ating wii:h the two major haulers on a price. P7rs. Tipler indi.cated that she was still negotiating, i~ir. Fahey asked if tkzere would be a reduction in collection costs if residents recycle. c1rs, Tipler indicated that 9.n t1~e ~ast ther~ was b~cause ot the markets tkiaE were available, but she felt tha~ this was not ttae case anyrnore, Page -16- A7inutes City Council P4ay 2~, 7.9II9 Organized _ _ in~roduced the following resolution and moved Collection its adoption: (cont.) RESOLUT30N= O„ &9-5-21II - AUTHORIZING OUR SOLID U7ASTP ADVISORY C01~~P•12TTEE 'CO I3E AUTHORTZED ON BI~EIALF OF THE CTTX TO NEGOTIATP 11ND CONCLUDE AN ORG[~NI7ETJ COLL~CTION CONTRACT WITFT TII~ FOUR REC~'IATNTNG LICFIVSED HFIUL.P•,RSo EXCLUDTNG POOI2 RICfIARD'S, GdITFI A FLATE OF $1~,OII FOR ~PFIE 90-GALLON CONTAINER PLUS T4~70 T311GS; $10,5II FOR ~CHE 90-GALLOIV CONTAINliRy a9.21 POR TFIF 60-GALLON CONTIIINFRy S7.II3 FOR TT3L~ 30-GnLLON CONTAINFR 4VTTH ADDITIpNAL CFIIIRGES POR EXCGSS ITEP9S STSLL TO Fi~ NEGOTTATF,D 11S 6d~LI, AS THF I2ECYCLING CHIIRGE 7'0 I3E FFF~CTIV~ [~S SOON AS POSSS~iL~ 47ITF3 A 3-YEAR CONTRIICT FF20P9 'CF.IP Dt~TE OF SIGNING The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ` ~____ Ayes (5) F3lesener, Collova, Pahey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted, P4rs. sczlze asked t9rs. Tipler if the Committee would lilce to study developi.ng a plastics ban ordinance, ~~irs, Tipler said that she would mention it to the Committee. f~irs. Tipler indicated that some of the Committee members are thinking of resigning L-rom the Committee, t~rs. Scalze stated that the City could advertise for more members in its quarterly newsletter, P4rs, Tipler indica~ed ~hat she caill not be a rnember much longer because she is moving, I~1rs, Tipler felt that the Committee should look for a ne~v leader, Venetian NIr. Vitale, a representative from the Venetian Inn, appeareci Tnn IIoxing before the Council requesting approval oi an outdoor bo~ing tlatch match to be held at the Ven~tian Inn. ~2r. }'ahey aslced i£ P1r, Vitale saas going to have the match policed and Agencla supervised. P4r, Vitale indicated that fhey would have Paric Acldition Security policing the event, i1r. Vitale stated that iL the event w~as rained out, it would be rescheduled, t~1rs, Scalze asked if they were going to use the i5arket Place for extra parking. DZr. Vitale said ~Yiat they did have permission to parlc a~ the 1~7arket Place. Page -17- ~~7inutes City Council I~Iay 24, 1989 Venetian Pflr. Vit~le indicated that they neede~i apr>roval irom tkae Inn t3oxing Council subject to the au~horization from the Sheriff's t~i~tch Department. ~1r, Vitale stated th~t Cornmander ]3ergeron had (cont,) k~een notified and Pflr. Vitale walked through the event with him, introduced the follo~ving resolution and moved its acloptions RESOLU'.CSQN N0~ II9-5-219 - t~PPROVING TFII: VFNE`CTnIV INN' S RLQUFST FOR AIV ODTDOOR BOXING [ZATCFI ~'0 E3L' tIELD qN :IUNE 21, ].9E39 SU~JBCT TO TFIF AUTFIORSZAT:CON FROP-1 `CHF 9I3ERTE'P' u DEPARTI~IENT The foregoing resolution ~•~as duly seconded by ~_ Ayes (5) I3lesener, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Scalze, Nays (0). Resolu~9on declared adopted. ~ir, Vitale indicated that beer will be sold inside a teni~ and there ~vould be no hard liquor sold outside. P9r, Vitale stated that they would clean the area thoroughly a£ter the event, Recess The Council took a siaort breale. Ordin~nce [~9r. Pahey indica~ed that at a previous meeting, a moratorium No. 31~ on Little Canada Road and Centerville Road was discussed ancl ~~[oratorium the Attorncy was asked to draft up an ordi.nance on the LC Road/ mztter. The ordinance, if adopted, ~aould ~rohibi~. any Centerville development of the properties on the northeast corner of Little Canada Road and Centerville ~toad pending further study oE the City and the Facilities Committee. _ introduced tkie iollowing resolution and moved its adoptiona RESOLU~ TTON NO,, 0~'5_270 - APPROVTNG TIiE AllOPTION 0£ OPDINLINCE N0, 31~ PERTF~INTNG TO A MOI2ATORIUP-4 OIV TfiP NORTEIFAST CORNFR OF LITTL~ C11N21DA ROAD AND CENTERVILLE ROAD The foregoing resolution was duly secondecl by ~______~ Ayes (~l) I3lesener, FaheyP LaVa11e, Scalze, D7ays ( 0 ) . Resolution declared adopted. t~7r> Collova had not yet returned from tYxe brealc. Page -18- P9inutes City Council hiay 2~~ 19II~ Palmen P~iid Oaks 1lddition Agenda Ttem No. 11 Planning Commission Vacancy ~lgenda ~ddition t-tr, Fahey indicated that the Palmen matter has been postponed until the meeting on June 14, 19£3~. r-Zr. S~aeeney stated that he would like to receive a recomrnendation from the Fire Chie£ in writzng pertaining to P~1id Oaks Addition's water supply. It was indicated that Claudia Drabik is interested in becoming a member of the Planna.ng Comrnission, tJlrs, Scalze felt that DZs, Drabik is an concerned citizen and would be an excellent member of the Cornmission. its adoptiona introduced the following resolutic,n and moved RES~OLUTION NO• £39=5=221 - ACCEPTING CLIIUDIA DR~BIIZ' S 11PPLICIITION ~1S A P~9EMBGI2 OP THE PLANNIDIG COMAITSSION FOR TFIE TtEPlAIPdDEF OF TI]E VAC2ITED TER62 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by _ _ Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, LaVa11e, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Pmergency Pnr, E'ahey indicated that Dick ~ioss, Sr. had informed him Services that he s•~ould not resign from the position of Emergency Airector Services Director until the end of the year or until the City f-ound sorneone that was interested in taking his place, Agenda whichever came L-irst, Addi'tion Pir. Eioss indicated that he has gone to several meetings recently reyarding Flaz-PZat Response Teams. P~ir. S3oss stated that this subject has become a very hot one. t4r, t3oss indicated that the cities may have to contract, at their o~on correction expense, those services. A1r. I3oss ielt that there should be 89-6-265 someone presen~ to push for County support. Correction - Mr. Boss has decided not to resign until the Haz-Mat Response Team issue is settled. introduced the follo~ving resolution and mov~d its adoptiona RE~LUTION NO, 39-5~222 - R~Tt~INIDIG DICI~ ~;OSS, SR, 71S TfiE CITY°S FP4ERGENCY SFRVICES DIRECTOR UNTTL TFI~ END OP TFiF YEAR The foregoing resolution was duly t~yes (5) k3lesener, Collova, Pahey, Nays (0)e P,esolution c~eclared adopteci> seconded by _____ LaValle, Scalze, Page -].9- t7inutes City Council I~1ay 2.9, 19II9 Emergency One application was received for the nosition. The City Services Clerlc was requested to send Lhe applicant a letter oi thank (cont,) you for her applicationa Closeci A~Ir, Fahey indicated that the At~orney had requested a closed Session sESSion at the end oi the meeting to discuss the Ganzel ma~ter wkaich is not in litigatione Agenda 1lddition ~ introducecl tkie follor~ing resolution and moved its a<~opti.one RESOLUTTON NO f39-5T223 - 11PPROVIIQG A CLOSI:JJ S~SSION AT TI~F SND OF 7'F3E NIEE7'ING TO DSSCUSS TII~ GAN7PL [•7ATTEI: Tiie ioregoinc~ resolution was duly seconded by _ _~___~ ~1yes (5) z3lesener, Collovap I~ahey, LaValle, Scalze, N1ys (0). Resolution declared adopted, Pire FIall/ P1r, Gri.ttman indicated that l1e is ~~rorking on the site plan City IIall ~roposals for the Fire Hall and will hav~ them ready by the Proposals end of the week ~or review by the I'acilities CommitL-ee, P1r. E'ahey indicated that the Committee gave D9r, Grittman four or Agenda five different sites for him to loolc at and asked hirn to try Addition to iit a potential City Ilall and/or I'are IIall combination on each of the sites, Is1r. Fahey indicated that tk~e Counci.l ~aa.ll also get copies of the proposals. tZVI3P9 b7rs. Scalze aslceci what tkae status was on the KVBP9 Television `celevision proposal. r1rs. Scalze indicateci that KV~M is loo{:ing at several different locations in Little Canada, C~1rs. Scalze Ac~enaa asiced ii Y.VBNI ehose a location on property the City did not 1lddition o~~m, would the City still get a rental fee from them, P7r, Fataey felt that there would be a rental fee regarclless of v7hich location they chose, P7r, ~3lesener fel~ that the proposal would require a conc3itional use permit. P~lrs, Scalze was unsure if the City could charge a rental cee, i~7r, ~3lesener felt tha~ the tower would not be a benefit to the City unless the City received a rental fee, h]rs. Scalze felt that KVPA1 Sr,ouia ue informed of the Council's intent on this matter. ~~1r. Fahey agreed ~hat a simple letter should be sent telling th~m if the tower as place within the City, the City would e;cpect a user°s lee> t1rs. Scalze asiced t~1r. Sweeney if this could be done c~aithout an ordinance. tir, Sweeney seas unsure, Page -20- Piinutes City Council rlay 2~, 19t39 ICVF3M 13r. Blesener aslced Mr. S~aeeney to give a report at the next Television mee~ing as ~o whether they need an ordinance in this (cont.) situation. ~conomic 1,1r. t~ahey indicated that the F3conornic neveloprnent Committee Development had met earlier and has had three proposals come a.n from Business Development SErvices in regard to the property on ~genda Country Drive. All of the proposals have indicatecl that the T.tem No, 15 developers are interested in putting in sorne type oE office, showroom, industrial park development in tP~at area, t~1r. Fahey indicated that a meeting has been scheauled wi~h these cievelopers for June 1, 19~9 at 3:00 p,m, at City Ha11 to explore tkae ideas that they have. P4r, Fahey statecl ~hat tkae City is bec~inning to mal:e progr~ss in this area. Facilities i7r. Fahey indicated that the Facilities Committee has been Committ~e rneeting regularly. They have toured various fire halls to get some ideas Lor our Fire Ha11. ~lgenda 1lddition Seal Coat P7r, F3lesener indica~ed that the City's low bidder was Allied Bids E3laclctop, Mr. T3lesener stated that the City's n~w superinteneient Dave Ilarris feels that the City should be Agenda using a smaller rock. The bids received were basecl on a Item No. 17a larger rock. Pnr. I3lesener asked if the City would have to rebid based on the smaller roclc. PZr, s~aeeney felt that the City ~ooulc~ have to rebid. introduced the following resolution and moved its adopti.onc RBSOLUTTON= 0,_ f39=5=22~] - CALLTNG POR NE6V I3ID5 TO T3E TAK~N FOR SEAL C011`PING B~S~D ON TIIE SMIILLFR ROCY. The toregoing resolution ~vas duly 11yes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, Nays (0). Resolution c~eclared adopted, seconded by _____ LaValle, Scalze. r1r. Slesener stated that 4Tinc7row ~rive and 6Qestwind Drive have had problems saitki the larger roch that has been used ior seal coating their streets. P~1r. Blesener indicated that he is wa9.ting ~o talk to someone from the CoY,e ReLinery to see it fog seal with sand would be a feasible method oi correcting tkie saiety problem. Page -?.1- Minutes City Council May 2~, 19t3~> Joe Steele C~ir, Blesener indicated that tie would like to name Joe Steele as a temporary lead man v~hich H~ould be retroactive to the 1lgenda day that ~oger Glanzer left the City, P~Ir, F3lesener stated ~cidition that Joe would be ternporary until Dave Harris decides to promote him to a£ull-time permanent lead man or until Azr, IIarris feels that the City aoes no~ need a leacl man> t-1z, E3lesener telt ~hat i>1r. Steele should receive an hourly bonus o~ .61 cents per hour> The bonus would cease ii he did not becom~ the permanent lead man. _ introduced the following resolution ana rnoved its acloption: RESO~UTTODt_N0, F9_5~2?5 - PitOA10mING JOE STEELL AS 11 T~MPORARY LFAD Pfl11IV IN TIiF PUBLIC 6VORiCS DEPART~9ED]T b1ND GRAN`1'ING IIINI A E~ONUS 0[' .61 CENTS PER HOUR RETP.OAC`r'TV~ TO ROGER GLIINZEP.' S LAST llAY 'l'he foregoing resolui;ion was duly s~conded by _ ___. ~~yes (5) Blesener, Collova, Tahey, LaValle, Scalze, Nays (0), ~tesolution declared adopted, t:eller Pkwy, Pzr, Collova indicatecl ~hat the Keller Parkway Bike Lane F3ike I~ane Cornmittee met with Duane McCarty and his representative I~en, wkio is in ckzarge of the daily operations and the crews that n9enda go out and repair the shoulders of roads. A7r. Collov~ zlddi.tion stated that ~~1r. P9cCarty had indicateci that witkzin the next year, he will llave to do more patching on the shoulders around the Lake, P4r. Collova felt the Committee should walk the Lake to come up with some ideas, tdr. t~lcCarty ~aon't take any action until the CommitteE has come to an agreexnent on the matter. P4rs. Scalze sta~ed tYiat she fel~ the Comrnittee tvas narro~aed down too far, T~Irs. Scalze ielt that there were Nome rnembers of the Committee that do not want the bike lane at all and joaned the Committee to see tk~a~ a bike lane was not ins~alled, D1r. ~'ahey f~lt tkaat seven members on the Committee was enough, PZr. Collova felt that it was good to have di.iference ot opinions on the Committee, r9r. Collova indicated that the Committee should go dovm to the Lake to come up witka an idea that they could work t•~ith, Page -22- ~7inutes City Council t9ay 24, 19II9 Reller Pkwy, CRr, Fahey indicated tk~at the Committee was formed to look Bilce Lane into public safety and the possibility of a trail. (cont,) P~1r. F'ahey stated that l~e did not feel waiting until the road 4aas rebuili: betore installing a bike lane was an unreasonable position. P4r. Fahey commented that the Council should take the recommendation of the majority of the Committee, r1r, Collova indicated that the road is scheduled for overlayment in 1992. t9r. Collova felt that the Ci~:y should not caait until 1992. before taking any action on the bil~e 11ne, NIr. Fahey stated that he would like a recommendation from ~he Committee, It was h1r, 3'ahey's opinion that for safety reasons, a trail should be installed around the lalce, t1s. Claudia l~rabik, chairperson of the Committee, appeared before ~he Council to state tl7at the present Comrnittee is just a subcommittee, The original Committee made up of 17 people is still intact, P•1s. Drabik inc~icated tkaat tkie wYiole Comrnittee ~~iJ.l be givi.ng thc Counci.l a final recommenclation> ~4r. F'ahey stated that the goal of the Committee should be to malte Reller Parlcway as safe as it can by upc~rading the existing skaoulclers. The bi{ce lane could corne in the Euture. P~Ir. £ahey aslced t~IS, Drabik to inform the Committee ot the Council's recommendations. c~ir. Carley indicated that he saould check with the County to get information on the sk~oulder easement, [•Zr. Carley stated that he would give a re~ort on his findings to Mr. Collova, North 49rs. Scalze indicated that the City has submitted a Suburban request to the North Suburban Youth for 525,000 o~hich 4~as Youth Grants half of the irrigation system for Pioneer Park, Dlrs, Scalze further indicated that a grant application for 519,500 was Agenda submitted i:o the North Suburban Xouth in connection with 1~ddition Celebrate hlinnesota 1990 ior a trail system. This grant was denied, P9rs. Scalze felt that the City should apply f-or an additional grant caith tYie North Suburban Youth for a back~top, fencing, etc, ~4rs. Scalze stated that the City would like to install backstops this year; however, the backstops and fencing should be installed at the same time. Page -23- P•linutes City Council May 2~, 19II9 North P~Irse Scalze stated that according to the landscape Suburban architect, the grass at Aioneer Park should not be played on Youth Grants until next year. t=1r. Fahey felt that residents should be (cont.> allowed to play on it ~his year. Mr. Fahey indicated that if the Park has to be closed on account of the grass, tne Council should be informed of ~hat. 1~9r. Fahey also felt that installing backstops and fences ~•~ou1d encourage people to play on the fields. P+Irs, Scalze felt that the City has to ge't gunding for the project now. Mr. Blesener indicated that the money could be put in escrow for future use, Gervais ~7ill f4rs, Scalze indicated that the ~Vatershed District is Park interested in working with the City on ~oater retention for the Gervais ~4i11 site, r1rs. Scalze stated that the Agenda Watershed District is working with Bi11 Sanders on the Addition project. Mrs. ScaJ.ze indicated that the Parlc Commission would like a resolution requesting Mr, Carley to stake the north property line on the Swanson Plat so they can see ~ahere that fits with Gervais Mill Park. introduced the following resolution ~nd moved its adoptione RESOLUTION N0, II9-5-226 - REQUESTTNG THE ENGINEER TO STAICE TE3E NORTH PROPERTX LINES OF TIIE SWANSON PROPERTI' Vouchers The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ~~,~___, Ayes (5) 131esener, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted, Nirs. Scalze asked D9r. Carley to notify Bill sanders when it was staked so he can look at it, its adoptions introduced the iollo~oing resolutaon and moved Agenda Item Nom 20a RFSOLUTZON~~_ II9-5-227 - APPROVIIVG TEIE VOUCfIEItS The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by _ ~_~ Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0), Resolution declared adopted, Page -24- P-linutes City Council MMay 29, 1~II9 Dawn Inman AYr. Fahey indicated that the Council has received a request for a donation from the City from Dawn Inman. Dawn is a Agenda senior at Roseville Hiyh School and has been chosen to be a Addition United States Stuclent Ambassador to Russia, The trip ~oill cost about 54,000 and Dawn must raise her own funcling. Mr. Fahey asked Nir. Sweeney if the City could legally use public funds for this purpose. Mrs. Scalze was under the impression that the City cannot donate money to an individual. Mr, S~aeeney also felt that public funds coulcl not be used in this situation, Mr. LaVa11e felt that the Council should mafce a request on behalf of Little Canada to the North Suburban Xouth 1lssociation for Dawn, e9r, LaVa11e felt that this was related to youth activities. NIrs. Scalze sta~ed ~hat Dawn should approach the North Suburban Xouth Association on her o4m. Mr. Fahey stated that the Council could endorse her request. P•1r, Pahey indicated that the City could give her a letter containing the endorsement, AZr. Chlebeck suggested that the Council malte a resolution to that e£fect instead. its adoptions introduced the follo~~ing resolution and movec~ I2ESOLUTION NO _£39-5-22II - ENDORSING DAWN INMAN'S RF~UEST FOFt FUNDING FROM THE NOR~'FI SUBUI2AAN XOUTEI ASSOCI~ITION E'OR flER TRIP AS ~ UIVITEA STIITES STUDENT AP-9BASSADOR TO RUSSIA The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by _ _~~ Ayes (5) Slesener, Collova, F'ahey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Page -25- Minutes City Council May 2~, 1959 Adjourn _ introduced the L-ollowing resolution and moved its adoption: ~genda Item No, 21 RESOLUTION~N~, 8~=5_229 ° ADJOUFZNING The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by __ _. Ayes (5) Elesener, Collova, L'ahey, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. There being no further busi.ness, the meeting was adjourned at ~_~_ p.m. Respectfully submitted, Peggy Jensen Recording Secretary Page -26-