05-24-89 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~Iinutes City Council May 2~, 7.9II9 Hardee's introduced the Eollowing resolution and moved i~s CUP adoptions (cont,) R~SOLUTION~_0 £39-5-209 ° CLOSING TIiP PUSLTC IIEARING ON THE ITFIRDF£' S CONDITIONIIL USE PERIv17T The foregoing resolution ~oas duly seconded by ~ Ayes (5) k3lesener, Collova, £ahey, LaValle, Scalzeo Nays (0), Resolution cieclared adopted. A Councilman asked about the loading dock that was not shovm on the plan, The Council was assured tkalt it would be shoFm on the tinal plan. introduced the following resolut9on and moved its aao~czone RESOIiUT~ON_DIO._ f39=5~2~ - APPROVING TFIE CONDITIO~AL USF PERP~ITT FOR TFT~ PROPOSED HARDEE°S SITE PURSUAIVT TO TFIF R~COA'1P-1EIVDA'1'7.ONS OF' THE CITX PL~DtN~R ADID TIIE PLANDtI1VG COP~IP/fIaSION The Loregoing resolution was duly seconded by _ ___~, ~yes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, Lavalle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted, The Itardee°s representative was asked if he would concluc~e ttiat of a friendly amendrnent with the requirement that the north access be a rigkit turn only. The Hardee's representative accepted this requirement. Text The proposed text amendment is relating to the height of ~~mendm~nt ~reestanding signs near limited access freewaysm A number Signs of cities were called and no one seems to be lilce anyone else, The Ordinance the City Council a.s considering is like ngenda Vadnais Heights and it is readable enough to enforce i~. Item No. 6 t9r, E3lesener asked abou'c the section i.n the proposed text amendmen~ that read "on parcels which serve a common property line,,,.,the maximum sign kieight skzall be allowed to be 30 feet". t•4r, Eilesener stated that the Code says that all free s~andiny signs sha11 conform to the following provisions. Mr. Blesener indicated that on the table oi permi~ted sign areas and hea.ghts, he did not see anything that precludes that you can bypass the square footage and get the height, Page -9-