Laserfiche WebLink
r~zr~v~crs <br />'i~y Council <br />August 23, 19E39 <br />the necessary right-of-way for the cul-de-sac as determined <br />by the City Pngineer as wel7._ as drainage and utility <br />easemen~s on lot lines, <br />Scalze pointed out that the cul-de-sac is large, and that <br />the Planning Commission c~uestioned the ri.ght-or-saay. <br />Plesener pointed out that ~ahen ~he cul-de-sac r~as put in t~~~o <br />years ago, a portion tieas on St, John's Church property< The <br />City then purchased the ~roperty from Sta John's sor the <br />right-of-way, <br />Johnson reported that he measured ~he cul-~le-sac and it is <br />36 feet in diameter, <br />The City Engineer reported tha4. the cul-de-sac saas adec~u~te <br />in size and tkiere o~as adequate right-of-~aay a`.or it. <br />Fakaey inf_ormed [~r. Johnson that the City would need drlinage <br />and utility easements along property lines. These are <br />usually 6 feet on either sicie of lot li.nes, and ~his h1s <br />been City policy in all subdivisions, <br />Mrs, Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoptions <br />ItESOLUTION NO. &'~J-£3-379 - APPROVIIVG TII~ GRFG <br />JOHNSON SUI3DIVISTON ItEQUFST TO DIVIDE IIIS <br />PROP~RTX F1T 329 S~VAGF LAN~ INTO T490 LOTS <br />SUBJFCT TO COMPLSFINCE YJI'PII T(IE RECOP7PIED'IDAT20N~i <br />OF TEiP CITY PI,IINNEP, AND TFIE DFDIC~TION OF TfIP <br />IVECESSI\I2Y DRAINAGF ANn UTIL~I`CY EAS~T4FNTS ODT <br />L~0`C LIDIFS AS RFCOMhIPD]DI;D Bl' TIIF CITX PNGINFI~P <br />The foregoing resolutiorz ~aas duly seconded by A1re Faheya <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, F'ahey, ~3lesener, LaValle, Collova, <br />D?ays (0) e <br />P.esolution declared adoptecl. <br />PUI3LIC Fahey opened tkie Public He~ring to consi.der the apk~lication <br />II£ARIPdG submitted by St. Croix screen Print for site plan and <br />ST. CROZX amendment to conditional use permit to build an addition <br />>CRFED? PRZNT to 1n existing structure at 29 b9< Viking Drive, Fahey <br />CUP ~ointed out that the Planning Commission recommended <br />a~?proval subject to the recommendation of tYae City Planner <br />as contained zn his report dated August 3, 19II9, <br />Page 2 <br />